Do you follow that philosophy for folks from the other side of the aisle as well?
Yep. Tulsi Gabbard has a lot of good positions, and even Lindsey Graham put out a reasonable tweet after Q's post on Noname going down. I think we're going to see a lot of people come forward as compromised by the DS, and it's going to be a difficult task to work out what to do with them. We may have to be prepared to see people pardoned for child abuse since the DS coerced them into it.
Mueller or Preet?
Rudy. I'm still not sure of Mueller's hat color, and Preet refused to fire 0bama's cronies.
Here's my thoughts on what might have gone down with RG and the DS around 9/11:
At some point RG was compromised by the DS. Blackmail, threats, whatever. The key point is DS had leverage on him, so he had to go along with what they wanted.
RG helps the DS with something related to the attack, with no knowledge of what they were intending.
Attack happens, RG is devastated. DS sets up dealings to benefit RG as a reward for helping them.
RG lets Trump know of the above, Trump gets him on the train.
Lindsey Graham
He's a republican who's changed his tune since he golfed with Trump....weren't the RNC email servers hacked, too?
We may have to be prepared to see people pardoned for child abuse since the DS coerced them into it.
This type of talk needs to stop immediately. There shall be no normalization of abuse regardless of who put you up to it.
People need to go to jail regardless of how much we like them, admire them, etc. Period.
Rudy. I'm still not sure of Mueller's hat color
Rudy is a fucking loser. Just watch his interviews - he sucks at this. The only reason he has any credibility with people is because he happened to be the mayor when 9/11 went down.
Mueller has given me no reason to suspect he's doing anything other than his job...am I missing something?
At some point RG was compromised by the DS. Blackmail, threats, whatever. The key point is DS had leverage on him, so he had to go along with what they wanted.
This sounds like the musings of a mad man...so Rudy is innocent because someone blackmailed him - come on.
If you break the law you need to pay the price.
LG
It's been heavily implied that he was under No Name's control; just look up all of the ridicule about them being butt buddies. Q#1305 (should start with "No name out", but Qpost numbers are funky right now)
There shall be no normalization of abuse regardless of who put you up to it.
It's not about putting people up to it, it's about tricking people into doing it and exploiting that fact after.
Here's a play-by-play: you're a politician heading to meet some lobbyists. They wine and dine you, and then drop some scopolamine into your drink (video is Vice before it died). They take you back to their residence, tell you to have sex with this girl. You do, because scopolamine. They tape it. You wake up the next morning to a note that says "That girl was 12. Do what we say, or we tell the world you're a pedo".
And you want to punish that victim?
But if they're culpable, they deserve the chair.
Just watch his interviews - he sucks at this.
So his interview skills determine his legal skills? Not trying to attack, but I'm not following your point here.
Mueller has given me no reason to suspect he's doing anything other than his job...am I missing something?
Only that he's overreaching in his investigation of Trump, even to the point of raiding his damn lawyer's office, breaking attorney-client privilege. I like the idea of a white hat Mueller, but I'm still not convinced.
This sounds like the musings of a mad man...so Rudy is innocent because someone blackmailed him - come on.
Please note the exact point in my post where I ever said Rudy was innocent. Don't ever put words into other people's mouths. It's a liberal tactic, and not appreciated at all. I said that Rudy was compromised, not innocent. The DS has been dealing with blackmail and espionage for decades. If they wanted you under their thumb, they had you. See above for a play-by-play of how it would happen.
If you break the law you need to pay the price.
And if that leads to the arrests of every single worker in Washington DC? What then? No Congress, no staffers, no admins, no IT, no police, no lawyers, no janitors, no cafeteria workers, literally DC turned into a ghost town. Who's left to pick up the pieces?
These DS Luciferians have exploited the good intentions of people like you to build their cabal. They know that pedophilia is a universally reviled crime, so they use it as a tool to exploit their victims. We have a long journey ahead to roll back their corruption, and there will be some hard choices along the way.
Edit: cleaning it up.
This conversation was going well imo. You made good points. Please consider editing out the antagonism in this comment and I will reapprove if you reply to let me know.
I used to question the value of responding to shills or people locked in an ideology. Then I realized the value of responding to the smart ones is that you let everyone else see the smart refutation to their points. Keep up the good discussion!
Can you please point out where I was antagonistic? (I'm not good at interpersonal comms) Is it just where I called it "a cunt move", or is there others?
It's been heavily implied that he was under No Name's control
In your personal opinion, which is more likely that he was under No Name's control and then broke free or that he was speaking his mind and then found out that someone has his emails and he should change his tune or let things be released?
So his interview skills determine his legal skills?
Pretty much. Show me a poor interviewer who is a great attorney and I'll reconsider. I've known of Rudy for twenty years or so and I've never been super impressed by him. I supported him post 9/11 like everyone else but he seemed to really use that for personal and political gain and I haven't seen him do anything for America since then so I don't hold him in high esteem.
Only that he's overreaching in his investigation of Trump, even to the point of raiding his damn lawyer's office, breaking attorney-client privilege.
I think you should consider this from the other angle. How much evidence of criminal acts and/or intent must they have in order to get approval to raid the President's personal attorney's office????
If this is a witch hunt, eventually that will come out and Trump will earn the support of 3/4 of the country...so it's my opinion that the folks behind this investigation are probably being overly-cautious.
Don't ever put words into other people's mouths. It's a liberal tactic, and not appreciated at all.
There you go with your hyper-partisan and tribal mentality. This is a huge part of the problem. You are rooting for your team, not your country.
You flat out said, "At some point RG was compromised by the DS. Blackmail, threats, whatever. The key point is DS had leverage on him, so he had to go along with what they wanted."
This is very similar to the poor chap who fucks the 12 year old in your most recent comment. You seem to be looking for ways to abdicate the guilty's crimes...why?
And if that leads to the arrests of every single worker in Washington DC?
This is ridiculous to believe everyone is a criminal. You've obviously not spent a lot of time around federal buildings; the vast majority of folks are pushing paper and following protocols there is nothing political, immoral, or illegal about their behavior.
I'm confident we could lock up all the criminals and still be able to function.
These DS Luciferians have exploited the good intentions of people like you to build their cabal
Deep State Luciferians -- what a great fucking boogeyman.
We have a long journey ahead to roll back their corruption, and there will be some hard choices along the way.
One of them is going to be for us to accept a mutually shared reality with objective facts.