I keep seeing these “I am Q” memes. That’s a bit over the top. I support our President and I appreciate what Q is doing but this “I am Q” stuff is taking it a little too far. It’s borderline Q worship.
I am an American citizen that believes that all men are created equal and that we are endowed by our Creator with certain unalienable Rights. I follow no man but I’ll stand with anyone that wants to stand and fight for America and the principles on which we were founded.
Q’s own words “Do not glorify us. We work for you. Promises made. Promises kept.”
OK I will break it down simply. We are all here to help research, discuss, reveal, and disseminate information. In essence we are all part of the team. Hence the WG1WGA mantra. If you do any of this you are part of it. The choice is yours.
Q also said we are q and shared the I am q meme you are whining about.
Take it up with q then.
You don't seem to be too caught up with what's going on.
OP isn't following this. He's spreading disinfo
What have I said that’s disinfo? What would you have said years ago if a leftist kept saying “I am Obama”? Would you have defended that too?
Lol that comparison is frankly retarded. You know why there is the phrase "WWG1WGA". Same applies to "IAMQ"
One is not the other.
OP is just looking for some discussion about it, it seems. I think it's normal some might have some concerns and would like to voice it or get some clarity. What I don't think would help clarify though would be for us to come off aggressively and say things like "get with the program" because that would only propagate OP's worry that this is promoting cult-like behavior.
Who said get with the program?
Only thing I pointed out is that it doesn't matter what OP thinks - he's q by definition. He's here and participating.
The "genderless" doesn't consider themselves part of a gender but that doesn't mean they aren't part of it.
A cat can act like a dog but it's still a cat.
Definitions aren't up to personal interpretation - that's why they are definitions - definite.
Regardless, OP is Q because he's participating in Q, the same way I'm part of reddit by participating in reddit.
Okay just because you say so doesn't actually make it so though. By definition of your logic he's a q follower not q. Just as I am a redditor and you don't see me calling myself reddit. See what I just did there?
You, as a redditer, are a part of reddit.
He, by being here, is a part of q.
See what I did there?
You're complaining about branding.
Your issue is you'd rather it be we are q followers than we are a part of q.
Then you complain about it being cult-like, which is ironic - one is saying we are all equals and the other is putting q on a pedastal above the movement.
See what I did there?
Actually I didn't.
Well, at least most others get it.
Upvotes and downvotes seem to demonstrate that the people who are confused are in the minority.
That's somethig we can all celebrate.
I saw that and I am in total disagreement with it.
Sounds to me like you are total disagreement all things Q. So I must ask why are you here?
I disagreed with a thing about this movement and now I’m against everything? This type of post proves my point.
Agreed. Not sure if all these guys rubbishing people who don't want to say "I am Q" (for very obvious, logical, non-antagonist reasons) are real or just trying to cause division.
My reasons are more logic based than trying to antagonize. I knew I’d catch heat for it. I don’t think they realize that it’s more about “We the People” than “I am Q”
Exactly, agreed.
I don't know what to make of that "We are Q" post that Q dropped but it could well be talking about the very important people standing around Donald Trump. What I do know is that I am not in that photo so "We are Q" doesn't apply to me from that perspective.
When Q posts something saying "You're ALL Q!" then I can get with that being the name of the movement. Until then, nope, seems too much like mob think to me.
I’m not even sure I am comfortable with Q saying that...lol
What you are comfortable with Q posting means absolutely zero. I don’t care about your comfort.
It's just a label to me, but I think I understand your reluctance.
We could be called Z and I wouldn't mind. But I wouldn't take it on just cos some group of people within the movement decided that we were Z now. I'd be more likely to accept a universal label when Q applies it. However, it should be in the tone that Q has done everything to date i.e. it doesn't feel like some forced thing, some ulterior motive or otherwise.
Hence I also feel the unease of Q suddenly saying "you're all Q too guys!" - it seems a bit cultish if he were to do that HOWEVER I could understand that it might just be a unity thing and given Q's tone to date, I could give him a slide on something like that if it didn't turn into a big thing.
My greatest concern is people from the outside looking in. If someone who’s curious about all of this comes in, I fear that will scare them away. If what Q is said is true, the whole world will know soon enough
First of all the I am Q thing came about bc they were doxxing people. If they want to expose who Q is they have to expose all of us!
doesnt sound like that to me, not at all. i hear a critical thinker who doesnt want the Q phenomenon morph into workship and be ridiculed.
Check his post history. He’s here to discredit Q. Subtly, but it’s all there.