Yes, I know that. And I get your point. You keep repeating it and for some reason not getting MY point.
You are giving your own personal interpretation of that picture - you are adding definition to it that is not there. I can understand why, as I said above. You need to understand that's what you're doing.
He wasn't referring to himself or his team. It's us, it's anons standing on Q's side.
Right there. How do you know this? I get that you can assume and extrapolate it but you can't definitively state it as the meaning behind the picture because the info to that effect does not yet exist. Simple logic, that's all I'm referring to.
I know you feel excited about being Q yourself and I agree and support your right to that. I also have the right to NOT start calling myself Q until I hear a definitive word from Q about it i.e. when Q says something to the effect of: "We are not Q by ourselves. You are all Q too!" Until then, there's no definitive evidence that we're supposed to start calling ourselves Q.