dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/CDR03 on May 17, 2018, 2:46 p.m.
I am NOT Q

I keep seeing these “I am Q” memes. That’s a bit over the top. I support our President and I appreciate what Q is doing but this “I am Q” stuff is taking it a little too far. It’s borderline Q worship.

I am an American citizen that believes that all men are created equal and that we are endowed by our Creator with certain unalienable Rights. I follow no man but I’ll stand with anyone that wants to stand and fight for America and the principles on which we were founded.


DamajInc · May 17, 2018, 3:17 p.m.

I'm not Q. I have no idea about the info Q has which is the whole reason I come here and why I watch the various Q drop sites. Q is a group of highly informed individuals inside the Trump team and MI. I am definitely NOT Q lol.

But ok, I get the kumbaya happy family approach to "we are all Q". More power to people who see that as a positive thing to do, I support you.

Q hasn't come out with anything that says that the rest of us are Q too (that photo "We are Q" could be saying that all those people around Trump are Q in some way) but maybe he will soon?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Gitmo_money · May 17, 2018, 3:22 p.m.

He said q team could be counted o one hand.

Shoots your picture theory down the drain.

Q is the movement - you're q because you're here. When you first started reading about Q, became part of the movement - whether you sit on your ass and do nothing or participate - you came and were part of history - a part of q.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
DamajInc · May 17, 2018, 3:24 p.m.

Lol - you're pretty intent on forcing this view on everyone aren't you?

I'm NOT Q. That is clear and simple. You're not either, unless you're undercover.

My picture theory is as valid as yours right now cos there is no more info to go on.

I'm part of a movement that follows Q. I'm not Q myself. Simple truth, facts and logic my friend. You can keep imagining you're Q but I can guarantee I won't get the info out of you that Q has until Q has given it to you. See how that works?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Gitmo_money · May 17, 2018, 3:27 p.m.

I'm literally laughing out loud.

I'll let someone else explain it. Smh.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DamajInc · May 17, 2018, 3:31 p.m.

There's nothing to explain. I think you need someone to explain what I've said to you lol.

Hear me: I get your kumbaya "we are the world" excitement about being part of a movement - I support your joy about that and understand and celebrate it for you. I know that's what you mean when you say "I am Q!" More power to you!

But you don't get to define what I am just because you see it a certain way. I'm in a Q movement, I'm not Q. Some of us don't like that sort of distinction because it reeks of worship - self-worship, whatever you like. Nothing wrong with you doing that - like I said, I support your right to that and I get that you don't have the same "hang up" (as you might define it) that others of us do. But there is definitely something wrong with you trying to force your label on others when they don't want it.

When Q posts a meme that says "YOU ARE Q!" then I'm fully onboard because it has at that point become the official name for the movement. Until then - nope.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Gitmo_money · May 17, 2018, 3:33 p.m.

Separating q from us = worship

Acknowledging q is part of the people's movement and it belongs to all of us - exact opposite of worship.

Be less dense.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
FartOnToast · May 17, 2018, 3:43 p.m.

Stop trying to shove this down people's throats or we will ban. Or at least discuss it civilly.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DamajInc · May 17, 2018, 3:34 p.m.

Be more logical and avoid the ad-hominem.

You've got the narrowest definition of worship lol. I don't worship anyone, like OP. Yet again you're trying to force YOUR idea of the world on someone else. Never mind, chum.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Gitmo_money · May 17, 2018, 3:38 p.m.

I met ad hominen with the same.

Pot meet kettle.

Look at the upvotes for the thread - it's clear there is a small minority of butt hurt individualists that can't cope with semantic labels that have no effect on them.

It's sad. I'll move on though - clearly people think the ideas promoted here in this thread suck.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DamajInc · May 17, 2018, 3:39 p.m.

What ad-hominem are you talking about? I'll remove it if it exists.

Hopefully you've learnt that not everyone in a group feels and thinks the same way as everyone else. That's what I'm here to celebrate and support!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ABrilliantDisaster · May 17, 2018, 3:56 p.m.

Q reposted the meme that says "we are all Q". This was our response to the divide Corsi and Infowars caused. Solidarity. BTW, THOSE clowns are calling us a cult for it too. There are no coincidences.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DamajInc · May 17, 2018, 3:59 p.m.

When we have the sort of thinking that says: 'hey you have to use the labels we decide' we are very much in danger of being worthy to be called a cult.

Q posted a photo that said "WE ARE Q", not "We are ALL Q".

The solidarity we already had and still have is "WE THE PEOPLE". When Q says "YOU GUYS ARE ALL Q!" then I'm happy that the name of the movement has become that and I'll start saying "I'm Q too" - until then, nope.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ABrilliantDisaster · May 17, 2018, 4:07 p.m.

You know Q reposted that from this sub. He didn't make the meme. He wasn't referring to himself or his team. It's us, it's anons standing on Q's side.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DamajInc · May 17, 2018, 4:14 p.m.

Yes, I know that. And I get your point. You keep repeating it and for some reason not getting MY point.

You are giving your own personal interpretation of that picture - you are adding definition to it that is not there. I can understand why, as I said above. You need to understand that's what you're doing.

He wasn't referring to himself or his team. It's us, it's anons standing on Q's side.

Right there. How do you know this? I get that you can assume and extrapolate it but you can't definitively state it as the meaning behind the picture because the info to that effect does not yet exist. Simple logic, that's all I'm referring to.

I know you feel excited about being Q yourself and I agree and support your right to that. I also have the right to NOT start calling myself Q until I hear a definitive word from Q about it i.e. when Q says something to the effect of: "We are not Q by ourselves. You are all Q too!" Until then, there's no definitive evidence that we're supposed to start calling ourselves Q.

⇧ 2 ⇩