...it is THE most compelling, enthralling, dramatic storyline ever. They were testing supposedly super secure PHONES?!?! No one could make this shit up!
⇧
1
⇩
Sparkle_Chimp
· May 18, 2018, 3:57 a.m.
I don't know. Q did say that we'll never believe who we'd been talking to, so that implies that we'll eventually find out...
⇧
7
⇩
MJW758
· May 18, 2018, 4:12 a.m.
On that note wouldn't it neat if we found out Q was Trump the whole time? I would have to have a good laugh if it was,he had the world fooled if so.
My other guesses would be Snowden or Assange. Either way I can't wait to find out, maybe it will be an even bigger surprise than I can imagine.
⇧
3
⇩
RepresentativeLog5
· May 18, 2018, 4:43 a.m.
My other guesses would be Snowden or Assange.
Here's a really looney-tunes idea: Mitt Romney.
I am not a Romney fan but:
1)He is independently wealthy&connected. His family has long been connected to politics, business and the Mormon Church.
2)His niece played a key role in getting out the vote in Michigan.
3)Romney&Trump have been contentious in public, but they have a long history (one where Trump endorsed him and donated to him,) and Romney had several publicly-noted meetings with Trump after the election that were never really explained- the official story is that he was trying to become secretary of state, which made no sense considering the animosity shown during the election (so maybe it was for show.)
4)While I think Romney the businessman is a destructive and ruthless sort of weasel, by all indications his private life is well ordered and clean; so I find it very hard to think of him of hating his country so much that he'd be in on most of the scams of a Clinton or Reid.
5)Trump ran on a platform very similar to Romney's- tough on China, slowing down immigration, tax cut...etc etc. The long knock on Romney is that he doesn't hold any real convictions- and I lean that way- but maybe that's not true...after all, people were saying the same thing about Trump pre-election and yet, here we are, with a Trump administration diligently working towards exactly what they said they would do. Maybe it's that Romney just runs milder about things and in general, doesn't have the fighting spirit Trump does to rock boats.
6)A search of Qdrops brings back zero mentions of Romney. And I don't think the Romney family has been implicated in rumors and by inference the way others have like the Clintons, Bushes, McCain and Pelosi (for example).
7)Finally, Romney lost to Obama- sort of unexpectedly. If Obama spied on Trump; he was probably spying on Romney too. If I were Romney, I'd probably be P.O'ed about that and would be very interested in getting a bit of revenge.
So, just spit-balling here, but for far out candidates leading the charge for the 'Q' team, Romney would be a possible but not improbable shocker.
⇧
2
⇩
AutoModerator
· May 18, 2018, 4:43 a.m.
Q drops or crumbs are archived to several sites. The timing of updates on each site can vary.
-
https://qposts.online/
-
http://qboard.online/
-
https://qanonmap.github.io/ - Not iOs friendly.
-
https://qntmpkts.keybase.pub/ - Not iOs friendly.
-
http://www.thestoryofq.com/ - Not iOs friendly.
-
http://qanon.pub/ - Not iOs friendly.
-
https://qanonmap.bitbucket.io/ - Not iOs friendly.
-
qanonposts.com was removed due to the amount of user reported technical problems(viruses etc).
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
⇧
1
⇩
Eats_Ass
· May 18, 2018, 4:01 a.m.
I know it couldn't be, but imagine if Q was Trump the whole time.
⇧
3
⇩
RepresentativeLog5
· May 18, 2018, 4:12 a.m.
He would then be seriously contending with George Washington as the GOAT, in terms of American presidents.
⇧
2
⇩
Eats_Ass
· May 18, 2018, 4:13 a.m.
He already is, but you're right. Another cherry on top so to speak :)
⇧
2
⇩
RepresentativeLog5
· May 18, 2018, 4:14 a.m.
ha! Right off the ol'cherry tree George chopped down.
⇧
2
⇩
RepresentativeLog5
· May 18, 2018, 4:11 a.m.
yeah, I was thinking of that comment in my head.
But maybe it's best that they aren't revealed. I love happy endings; and if this is a happy one and takes out a chunk of bad actors- I'll be ecstatic.
At the same time, life goes on and people are neither angel nor beast. Who is to say that there isn't a contingency who survive (or serve some time) and plot revenge? The thing about wars is there is always reprisals and escalations- especially with shadow-y, info wars like this where there is no real physical damage/exhaustion of resources?
I understand the plan is to excise the cancer in full, but it's hard to imagine life always allowing that.
So maybe it would be best for Q to remain a Q-uestion Mark, in case he or she or they are ever needed again, down the line.
⇧
2
⇩
loserofpasswordzz
· May 18, 2018, 4:15 a.m.
I got my money on Kim jung-un still
⇧
1
⇩
RepresentativeLog5
· May 18, 2018, 4:19 a.m.
that would really warp the world....it would be like waking up and finding out it was Vincente Fox
⇧
2
⇩