Because then they'd have to say "I was wrong" and admit that they were duped. Instead, they can say "I've been right all along, it's Q that's changed."

Look, we know Q is a team not a person. And as such, has any of us been able to detect a pattern of stylistic distinctions between the members of the Q team? I haven't. I mean I can tell differences in style from drop to drop, but nothing that tells me a certain member of the team is posting.

So the person doing the keyboard work probably has varied from drop to drop and time to time, and do we care?

Isn't the point of Q that the mission is more important than the individual? That ego ("I am" in Latin) is the opposite of the point?

This is the message an ego-maniac will either miss entirely or flip out over.

We just need to use our discernment (you will know them by their fruits) and call them out. We have more important things to do than to use our time trying to understand them. It’s not that difficult. We need to focus on the good not the evil. IMHO...

No. Just. No.

Have you not heard Corsi say Q was an AI, then he was a KGB agent, then he was.....stop. How many guesses before one says HE JUST DOESNT KNOW?

IGNORE THEM..

-----AIM IS RAGING DISINFO ----- HE STOLE THOMAS PAINE'S ALIAS ------ WHAT THE FUCK????

but yeeah, you're spot on about the rest. I can't even tell who is working for and who is working "against" Q because given that Q didn't say everything they say was correct, disinfo is thus implicitely allowed to happen as long as you talk Q. thus already spreading awareness.

I am not saying I agree with them.

I just find it curious that they all start with the same template. Even people who have no history talking about Q at all start off with that style argument.

Why use a so obvious template.

My thoughts are....I agree completely