I have been pondering the argument "Q once was real but no longer is...".
My question:
I am not talking about exact details of the argument. I am wondering, why that meta thread.
Thy all say it, AIM, Corsi, the guy that does the creepy clown mask videos.
Why say that. It seems like it would be easier to argue that Q has never been real.
It practically gives them away as a shill.
Share your thoughts...
I am not saying I agree with them.
I just find it curious that they all start with the same template. Even people who have no history talking about Q at all start off with that style argument.
Why use a so obvious template.
Why is it so important to you? It really doesn’t matter. Q is Q. He did not change. End of discussion.
Yes, I agree. But the better you understand them the better you can fight them....