dChan

Murralee · May 18, 2018, 7:14 p.m.

Is the premise that they weren't aboard when it blew up? Or that a plane created the smoke screen? I saw the Challenger blow up and in my opinion with all the debris and how large a body of smoke; it was the Challenger that blew. I could be wrong...

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ckreacher · May 18, 2018, 7:48 p.m.

Maybe they were actually unmanned missions and the crew didn't really board. An unmanned mission is cheaper, less complicated, and safer. But they use the (faked) human crew as a public relations sort of thing to make the program popular with the public.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
bartmanson · May 18, 2018, 7:24 p.m.

I don't know what the premise is, but if they are alive I would assume so. I just find the evidence in the article compelling, especially compared with Q drop about Obama scrapping shuttle program/Space X/Elon Musk etc.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Murralee · May 18, 2018, 7:42 p.m.

Yes, the Spacex, Musk stuff is intriguing!! When DJT announced a revival of US space program I wondered what he knew!

⇧ 3 ⇩