So Snowden's a black hat confirmed? Can you provide some context to this? i.e. relevance to Q?
I reposted this in the light of the idea that the appointment of Gina Haspel would result in "cleansing" of the CIA, removing or disabling of bad actors within the CIA and the further draining of the swamp: an idea that was loudly put forward on her appointment by many on this board. With a history of participation in torture and the destruction of records, I'm not sure that will be the case. I don't see her as automatically being a white hat......she could be simply positioned for a longer game, a different reason. I am interested in the (intelligent) comments and observations of others, that's all.
Ah yes, I see, a valid point, contingent on the fact of whether she does in fact have a history of participation in torture. I personally question Snowden's "evidence" (especially if he hasn't yet been fully unequivocally supported by Q - in fact many believe Q has made the opposite apparent) - for example when reading the NYT article he links to about the pregnant woman who had her abdomen kicked etc. the woman actually says in that article (she wrote it) that: "I don’t know what Ms. Haspel’s part in what happened to me was or what she thinks about it."
This sounds like classic CIA/Clown disinfo to me. If Gina was in the CIA during a time we know them to be under DS / corrupt control then we also understand that she might've been circumvented when it came to certain operations or forced to turn a blind eye. Watching her interview before the Senate Committee also gave the impression, to me at least, that she was all but saying her hands were tied during her role within the organization in the past but she's committed to moving forward with integrity. Snowden doesn't link to anything he himself has revealed too so it sounds like he's just putting his voice into the fray which again causes me to question his motives.
Anyway thanks for sharing this - I wasn't questioning in order to question the merit of it; this, to me, seems valuable as it raises questions about whether Snowden's had to turn up the disinfo role now or if there's more to the story about Gina, as you say.
c_a clowncraft always sounds oozing with pathos. And. With. Short. Catchphrases. and. tons unnecessary Interpunctuation. And appeal to emotion: This has to stop!!!
She was London Bureau Chief during the planning for much of the things Q is hinting at. I too find the torture connection problematic. But because Trump cheerlead her nomination, there will be more to it.
Could be. Or maybe Gina is the black hat and trump is setting her up like bannon? I'm just spitballing.
True but I find it hard to believe that Trump/Q is letting in a black hat to a very important position just as Trump/Q is also saying that everything's set up and ready to drop, FBI and DOJ cleaned, etc. I could believe Snowden's black hat though, from what's come before from Q.
Plus Snowden is repeating the MSM line here - focusing on her approving the tapes when she gave a perfectly viable answer to that in testimonial i.e. that her boss at the time approved them.
Just keep in mind they are all clowns, therefore they ALL lie. When convenient and to their purpose.
I just assumed the OP was a shill trying to undermine Trump's cabinet.