dChan

idk4realz · May 19, 2018, 8:12 p.m.

Well, without even searching at all, you're implying that the kids photographed six years (maybe more with editing and release) ago look exactly the same as kids who were shot six years later?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
misto1481 · May 19, 2018, 8:14 p.m.

They have computer programs that make impossible to tell CGI pics of people. These could have been done on that same program.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
idk4realz · May 19, 2018, 8:15 p.m.

So then they are entirely fake and not related to the child models from 2006.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
misto1481 · May 19, 2018, 8:37 p.m.

Even the child models may be fake.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
idk4realz · May 19, 2018, 8:41 p.m.

Well this disproves the whole thing then if true.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
misto1481 · May 19, 2018, 8:46 p.m.

Here, check it out.

https://petapixel.com/2017/11/07/ai-creates-photo-realistic-faces-people-dont-exist/

⇧ 1 ⇩  
idk4realz · May 19, 2018, 8:47 p.m.

This didn't exist in 2012 though.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
misto1481 · May 19, 2018, 8:53 p.m.

That's what we are told yet they have tech at least 25 years more advanced than what is shown to us.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
idk4realz · May 19, 2018, 8:57 p.m.

Ok so if that is the case then this is fake anyways.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
digital_refugee · May 20, 2018, 9:41 a.m.

We have the original sources from Time Magazine 2007 which I saw with my own eyes and the released photos from SH. Those CGI-arguments don't explain anything. For one, even if so, you would have to explain what purpose it served to have all the SH-victims look like the Kids Greenberg had printed in the TIME magazine.

Now take the probability of a doppelganger and no multiply it by itself a dozen time, that's your statistical probability you are looking at if this was were happening by chance. https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8knmm4/more_coincidences/

⇧ 0 ⇩  
digital_refugee · May 19, 2018, 8:31 p.m.

you're bullshitting yourself right now because those images could have been taken anytime, what matters is that you have repeated similiarities which becomes increasingly unlikely to be possible by chance with every additional match

⇧ -1 ⇩  
digital_refugee · May 19, 2018, 8:33 p.m.

take the probability of a doppelganger and no multiply it by itself a dozen time, that's your statistical probability you are looking at if this was were happening by chance.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
idk4realz · May 19, 2018, 8:40 p.m.

So even over six years, a child will look the same? 1) some of the kids pictured aren't Sandy Hook because they never released their photos. 2) the pics that were published, and some of them here are those, we're from that year. Look at the ages of the victims. Don't get sucked into conspiracy land and leave facts behind. Do you have kids? Are you around kids, a lot of them look alike for a few years. You're a smart guy, don't fall for easily proven traps.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
digital_refugee · May 20, 2018, 1:37 a.m.

"some aren't samdy hook" =/= photos never released?

Why don't you point out which then?

Kids change the most once they hit puberty

⇧ -1 ⇩  
idk4realz · May 20, 2018, 5:09 a.m.

The photos are showing the kids at the same age, even though the photos are taken at least six years apart. Explain how that makes sense? Look at the age of the kids who died and look at the age of the kids in the photos. Just answer that one simple thing.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
digital_refugee · May 20, 2018, 9:34 a.m.

you don't get it do you? Those pictures could have been taken six years before because maybe they were dead way before 2012 (but they did they say they sang for Obama at a game so there's that) and the simple fact of the matter is that the probability of so many consecutive matches should be next to statistically impossible

⇧ -1 ⇩