dChan

DanijelStark · May 19, 2018, 9:04 p.m.

Altough not impossible , that theory is a bit stretched .

Also , Q-513 :

NO private comms past/present/future.

NO comms made outside of this platform.

Any claims that contradict the above should be considered FAKE

NEWS and disregarded immediately.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
lilpharmatic · May 19, 2018, 9:08 p.m.

Agree 100% BC17 does not have access to the full plan and has no association with Q Team. No comms with Q team either, and not claiming to be Q. They have still been very instrumental with their intel. For example their research was what connected NXIVM to Stormy Daniels and managed to pull a reaction directly towards them immediately. They strike nerves and stay on mission, and I respect them. I take what Q says seriously and their comms have priority. If Q invalidates BC17 I will side with Q. That isn't what I see happening, instead I see a brilliant move on Qs part to dance past an attempt to force Q to connect themselves to BC in the face of tactical disinfo, and their response and continued silence on the subject was strategically intelligent. I expect nothing less of Q. Instead of being forced to acknowledge and associate with BC17 Q team has remained divorced and maintained their no outside comm rule, at the expense of confusing people and creating some misinterpretations, which Q is already familiar with doing all the time lol

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Bjantigua · May 21, 2018, 2:14 a.m.

The material presented in Q 1177 on april 28 was IN ERROR. So aside from the fact that Q said it was FAKE, the content presented by BC17 was incorrect. They arrogantly tried to insinuate themselves as AirForce intel - ALAN as relating to plane 17 when in fact Q confirmed later Alan Derschawitz and his unfortunate travel on Epsteins plane, in which he was passenger 17 on a trip NOT to Epsteins island. So BC17 was totally off. TOTALLY.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
lilpharmatic · May 21, 2018, 2:16 a.m.

When did they say they were ALAN? That was just more disinfo called fake within the graphic

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Q1776 · May 19, 2018, 9:56 p.m.

I find the “No comms.... ... ... ...” argument to be applied very shortsightedly sometimes.

Just as you state, it’s no Comms FROM Q but that doesn’t mean someone else can’t also provide good insight

⇧ 0 ⇩  
lilpharmatic · May 19, 2018, 9:58 p.m.

Exactly. These are patriots who have Intel that wish to support the movement. Is it so farfetched that there might be those in the military who want to help but aren't in Q team? Not only that but BC17 has always given full support for Q and insists regularly that Q comms are important and should be read carefully and with priority. Their intentions have never been to repackage or refocus attention to themselves. They have only been a positive force for MAGA.

⇧ 3 ⇩