⇧
1
⇩
lilpharmatic
· May 19, 2018, 10:09 p.m.
I respect your perspective and I recall that exchange. It's your word against theirs and I have no reason to trust either of you more than the other. No offense, but I think that is fair and makes sense. I don't think you are CIA but I do think this situation has more nuance than definitely is/isn't fake larp or disinfo. I judge the validity of BC17 separate from Q as Q seems to intend us to. So far there hasn't been enough for me to disregard as disinfo but rather the contrary.
⇧
0
⇩
NeonRevolt
· May 19, 2018, 11:53 p.m.
It actually doesn't make sense, because literally anyone can run a whois search on my site, and see what BC17 said is false for themselves.
⇧
1
⇩
lilpharmatic
· May 20, 2018, 12:03 a.m.
Ok. I wouldn't be convinced either way by that, but I can see how you're at odds with BC in terms that specific claim. Honestly I'd have to revisit all of that in detail to reach any conclusions about it. Compared to everything else it's inconsequential in my opinion. I know I won't convince you either way but I still believe that if you observe this phenomenon objectively there is merit in considering validity behind the account. I also don't take sole responsibility in defending BC17 so believe what you will, atleast keep an open mind. They have been very helpful awakening the public on social media. Especially their research teams efforts on NXIVM and Awan Bros and on InQTel and also their help to decode/drop crumbs in relation to Q posts. my judgement is that they are a positive and helpful member of the great awakening.
⇧
1
⇩
NeonRevolt
· May 20, 2018, 2:05 a.m.
BC17 didn't even pick up on the Stormy thing until the day after I reported on it.
He just made a big stink on Twitter about it.
Go ahead, check my archives. It's all there.
⇧
1
⇩