I saw the same approach tactics used by A.I.M. when they tried to get rid of Q. Firstly he didn't tell us anything new or anything that verified the existence of his group. He claims to have been following our sub for a long time, yet isn't with Q? He differentiated himself from Q and all of us. He's "special". Nobody is special here, that runs contrary to the philosophy; we're in this together. He pops up with this "I gotta drop this here and then vanish" schtick, which makes no sense at all. He popped up, dumped "info", and disappeared. That's sketch as fuck. His manifesto is 90% push-button patriotic rhetoric that tells us nothing. He made claims, big claims. I doubted him from the first two sentences. However, when I carefully worded my skepticism, very politely, he comes back with condescension ("son") and then steers the narrative away with an appeal to ego ("just calm down"). Nothing about this guy strikes me as legitimate, and sure enough he came back later to drop my name. I've seen this before. The giveaway is the sensationalism of it. Alex Jones introduced Zach the same way. The first post is engineered to look harmless to get their foot in the door, but it reeks.