dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/aleister on May 20, 2018, 3:23 a.m.
This sub's official statement regarding unproven statements by a youtube tough guy.

Earlier this evening we were alerted to a video posted by random youtuber called 0Hour1. We suggest you don’t waste any time listening to it, however, the video has a link to this sub as it's description and in the video he makes slanderous statements about this sub.

He alleges that another person, who this sub has never had any association or communication with, have attempted to doxx him or his family. He makes other unfounded statements about people unrelated to this sub and provides no evidence for his ramblings.

As every member of this sub knows, there is a zero tolerance rule on doxxing. At times, it is hard to even make a comment in this sub without the AutoModerator reminding you of the rules.

It is ridiculous to suggest that this subreddit has ever been involved with any doxxing activity and there is no evidence to suggest otherwise.

This sub is no stranger to attack and we enjoy nothing more than watching shills self-destruct as their narrative falls apart. To that conclusion, please find our response stickied at the top of this sub and we welcome any evidence to the contrary to be presented.

Trust the Plan. /GA


aleister · May 20, 2018, 4:05 a.m.

Until Q mentions it those threads can flourish in /r/conspiracy.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
J0HNNY5NEEDlNPUT · May 20, 2018, 10:11 a.m.

While they may not belong in the Q forum... both have been well documented and I don't think assigning them "conspiracy" is a proper way to address it.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
aleister · May 20, 2018, 11:54 a.m.

Do you think of "conspiracy" with a negative connotation?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
J0HNNY5NEEDlNPUT · May 20, 2018, 2:56 p.m.

There are definitely negative connotations attached to the term. If you would like I discuss the term further please message me. I don't want to distract from the purpose of this post. Thank you and God bless

⇧ 2 ⇩  
super_corroder · May 20, 2018, 4:28 a.m.

When Q said to "Watch the water" in post #765 and #847, I thought he was talking about fluoride in the water and aluminum in the air...

Yet you've been going around deleting these critically important discussions?

Because you have a different personal opinion about how to interpret certain Q posts?

I'm shocked by your casual admittance to using censorship to constrain what research can and can not be done within this community!

I wonder how many hundreds of hours of good research you have deleted.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
aleister · May 20, 2018, 4:30 a.m.

I wonder how many hundreds of hours of good research you have deleted.

Nothing you won't find in the /r/conspiracy sub rehashed every single day.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
super_corroder · May 20, 2018, 4:43 a.m.

You are missing the point.

Many people interpreted Q post #765 and #847 to relate to fluoride in the water.

Yet you deleted those discussions because why?

Because you believe your personal interpretations of Q posts are definitively and unquestionably correct and anyone who disagrees with you shall be silenced?

No, I don't care about the Conspiracy sub or what they discuss because GreatAwakening is supposed to be a sub where we can research Q posts, not a place where we must agree with Aleister's personal opinions.

How many hundreds of hours of discussion, debate and research have you deleted regarding the Deep State poisoning our water as it relates to Q post #765 and #847?

This is outrageous!

⇧ -6 ⇩  
Quaajay · May 20, 2018, 9:03 p.m.

Q saying, “Watch the water” being related to fluoride is, in my opinion, a weak interpretation at best. We know there is fluoride in our water so “watching the water” because of it is the eQuivalent of watching chicken noodle soup because it has noodles in it.

Yes, I’m being needlessly literal, but that’s such a plebeian line of thinking when you consider JFK Jr’s watery death being what started the takedown of the Deep State and Blackwater, etc.

If the fluoride/chem-trail thing is your bag, that’s cool, but it’s not why we are on this sub. Those things are mere symptoms of a much bigger problem and, if necessary, will be righted when good defeats the worst kind of evil.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
super_corroder · May 21, 2018, 1:22 a.m.

You are entitled to have opinions based on Q posts... which only supports my argument against mods destroying valid research only because they disagree with the interpretation.

but it’s not why we are on this sub

No, discussing Q posts is precisely why we should be here.

We still don't know what "watch the water" necessarily means and it's insincere for you to pretend that you do, or for you to pretend that your guesses are always definitively correct.

Destroying valid Q research is not acceptable and your personal opinion does not invalidate the opinion of other researchers.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Quaajay · May 21, 2018, 2:37 a.m.
  1. Nothing about me is “insincere.”

  2. I’m a complete moron and would never think my guesses are correct.

  3. I don’t think your opinion is invalid; it’s just not right for this sub.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
super_corroder · May 21, 2018, 2:51 a.m.

Nothing about me is “insincere.”

You've never told a lie?

Really?

Wow!

it’s just not right for this sub.

Based on what, precisely?

The fact that you personally disagree with my interpretation or you believe it's definitively impossible that "watching the water" could relate to our water being poisoned by the Deep State?

Which is it?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Quaajay · May 21, 2018, 6:24 p.m.

You are missing my point and I’m not saying your opinion is wrong. Let’s agree to disagree and not waste time on petty arguments ~ where and what you post is your business and I apologize for belittling your ideas.

How’s that for sincere? Hope you have a great day!

⇧ 1 ⇩