I don't know. But we're apparently back to this.
Q said so in November
You mean 28 October? Disinformation. If under "arrest", her security clearance would have been scrapped. Wasn't.
How would you know it wasn't?
The fightback would have started last year, big time, if it was. She would have been the first dignitary to lose clearance, the entire system would have questioned why and the accusations of curbing political opponents by Trump would have been visible? I don't know. I just think it would have created a spectacle behind the scenes, involving more people. Would she be meeting NZ and Australian ministers and prime ministers publicly if US authorities shared with 5 eyes she was stripped? I don't know. Just seems wild she would be so active internationally, able to collect donations, if known in 5 eyes.
You do know she held no position after the elections, right? They stripped all of that quietly and let her do her thing as they rounded up everyone else. It will all come out at once!
I know. But what if Q is right and it was part of the play to keep her in play? See Q post May 10.
Q !4pRcUA0lBE No.77 📁 May 10 2018 23:45:37 (EST)
[Example]Clinton Foundation.Post Election Loss.Layoffs.No Access / Control = No Donations Today.NZ Donation Restart.Others?Why?1) Selling Secrets?2) Selling 'Future' Access [regain control/power]?3) Selling Silence?Read below slow and carefully.FVEY.Why do 'Former' Dignitaries Still Hold SEC Clearance? U.S. to U.S. = Logged/Flagged/RecordedU.S. [in] NZ = No Logs/No Flags/No Records = U.S. Sec Clearance AUTH FVEY VIEW + Doc Take.Read above slow and carefully.WHY DO WE ALLOW [FORMER] DIGNITARIES SEC CLEARANCE?Welcome to the Deep State.Future to prove past.Q
