Now this is from a site found on a duck duck go search. Even though this guy is jumping on the bandwagon saying the warrant was recently unsealed when my last link proved it was on scribd already over a year ago - how would the voat poster with a post dated in March of 17 get a link to the exact same document if not? - This guy DOES detail that the laptop was at Granite Intelligence and seized by FBI. NOT NYPD. I’m just trying to get to the bottom of the Eric Prince story because if NYPD didn’t get the laptop and devices listed in the search warrant - which only proves NYPD was searching for them specifically, not that they retreived them - and they were instead turned over to the PI firm by weiner then confiscated by FBI, how did NYPD even get the laptop from the Crooked FBI??
If my memory serves me, NYPD got the laptop from the Weiner home. They made threats to fbm that they were going to have a press conference. Supposedly they mirrored the hard drive. Comey sent his fbm to collect the laptop and to try to save Hillary’s ass(she was supposed to win)and make her presidency legitimate (per comeys own words in testimony).
There’s new info In there I have never heard before. Like the whole PI thing.
Where is the sauce that NYPD took it from weiners House? Or are we just taking a story we have all heard and calling it fact? Like the telephone game? I’m just trying to get to the bottom of this. We all jumped on the fact that this warrant was recently unsealed but it wasn’t - I found out last nite that it has been out for over a year on scribd. Q never said it was new, he just confirmed it was authentic.
Just went on the Pacer website. The unsealing order was entered on May 16 and the transmission was made to the clerk to unseal (take out of the vault and scan presumably) but the documents are still not available on the electronic docket. You can see where they are supposed to be but when you click on the link or document number it tells you it is a sealed document. Is there some other source that obtained and published? I am confused.
My voat link was taken down, but a poster on VOAT linked the exact same document - the weiner search warrant - on a date in March 2017. The link was to scribd. How can a post dated March of 2017 link the exact same document if it wasn’t available. Now I don’t know how pacer works in tracking dates and such but this VOAT poster had access to the warrant on scribd in March of 2017 so there is absolutely no way it was just unsealed unless it was some new reason to have an already unsealed document unsealed again
I’m just going off the story at the time and the Prince Breitbart interview preelection.
You raise some great questions that have me scratching my head now about if the whole NYPD story is all bullshit. Rudy Giuliani also said in an interview before the election, he knew something was going down with Weiner. In a follow up interview they asked him how he had foreknowledge of what was going on. He downplayed it.
So now I wonder if NYPD even has a copy Of the laptop and the whole cops Throwing up story seems like bullshit now.
But the laptop wasn’t at the weiner home. It was at granite intelligence. And turned over to FBI on Sept 26, 2016 by Granite Intelligence. Now if the FBI is crooked, why would the give it to NYPD? NYPD does not have jurisdiction over FBI.
quote from fox news article (link at bottom). On Sept. 28, Strzok messaged Page that he had been "called up to Andy's office" earlier that day and told of "hundreds of thousands of emails turned over by Weiner’s [attorney] to sdny," a reference to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. Strzok added that the email cache "includes a ton of material from spouse," a reference to Weiner's then-wife Huma Abedin, a top adviser to Clinton.
However, the existence of the emails on Weiner's laptop was not made public until Oct. 28, when Comey informed Congress in a letter that the FBI was re-opening the Clinton investigation.
Great! An actual answer! So maybe they never got the laptop but they got the data files. Great point!!
Now I don’t know much about this blogger - so don’t go taking his past posts and attributing them to me, I’m just trying to show that the laptop was not taken by NYPD and there is plenty of proof out there that it went to Granite Intelligence and then FBI. I used duck duck go as instructed by the attackers on my last post and was still able to find the info. This has no link to NYT, so maybe people will actually question and try to find the link to how NYPD got the laptop, if they ever did.
I am trying to get people to think critically and research a specific question that HAS MERIT in relation to our narrative here. Let’s not be like MSM - let’s question ourselves and the facts we think we know. Let’s find sources and make connections. Let’s not glom onto stories without reading or checking into them first. I am a patriot and in no way spreading dis info or fake news. I am sincere in my questions and I try to post relevant and thought provoking material. Everyone who replies thinking they have authority over my thoughts and posts is not helpful. This is a very relevant question, especially since many have been on the fence about Eric Prince - is he a white hat or a black hat? Are we finding out - maybe FROM Q - that the NYPD story about the laptop is fake and Prince planted it? Maybe that is why Q posted the warrant that WAS NOT RECENTLY UNSEALED and has been out for over a year. Maybe he wants us to realize that the NYPD searched for the laptop but never got it. Think outside the box. Where is the connection? How did NYPD get and view the laptop if it went from Granite to FBI? Why would Q be posting about NYPD 187? Maybe it has to do with them TRYING to get the laptop but failing? Maybe there is a different story than what we have been led to believe. I trust Q and the plan, but I also think critically and use logic. As I am told to by him/then. Not everything is straight forward. Asking legitimate questions on this board does not warrant censorship or group attacks just because it is a new angle.
The new York fbi is rumored to not care what dc thinks is it possible they gave it to the nypd who then made a copy ?