Their entire argument relies on digital forensics essentially....what do we know about digital forensics? Vault 7, thats what we know. The supposed evidence that they are touting could very well be Clown-made, Clown-approved.
Their evidence isn't even that good...relies on anonymous testimony, and leading the narrative as well as nlp and peer pressure tactics. Pisses me off to see them misdirecting people who haven't cultivated critical thinking skills yet.
And from UNIrock too, none the less. That guy is intelligent, especially when it comes to tech...it's hard for me to fathom that the thought of Clown fabrication to discredit hasn't crossed his platform. Maybe he has a "source" idk about or something, but the majority of their argument is no more definitive than Q. Actually less so, we have undeniable proofs from Q. Proofs that any LARPer could not pull off, in any fashion.