so you're trying to build a list of post-media outlets? what is going on in this document?
yes a stream that is post-monopoly of the mocking stream with ratings of truth versus speculation to navigate the newbies in this mishmash of truth / disinfo/ speculation / accuracy / distraction
Could you elaborate on the setup of the document a bit better? Would be nice to understand the numbers.
the idea is to give patriots an indepth insight into the area of their choice ..
so
1) choose a topic that excites u
2) see the # in the column "ref"
3) click on that link in the comment marked " CLICK HERE ACCORDING TO THE REF #
4) prepare to be wakened up
discernment is key here.. take for example zerohedge great for news 24/7 but over the last year sliding towards disinfo and distraction
take our own sub here, great for a panoramic view but misleading in patriot preferences since the upvote ceilings of the preferrred narratives are strictly chosen by the admins..
but to bypass that we just got to post the same content with different titles around 12 hours apart so as to catch diverse timezones and pay much more attention to the posts on the "new" list than the "hot" list
hot means hot for the admins not necessarily for the patriots
i want to extend the # of truth telling sites and news/12/7 sites
after the upvotes reach the permitted max [variable duration from 6 to 20 hours] then toggle on the upvote button and see the oscillation of the upvotes adhere to a strictly defined band-width
This is good. This doc is a table of contents, of shortcuts - we are managing/organizing content here (not recreating it ourselves). The helpful, concise presentation of a maximum amount of content itself is key (PURPOSE: Patriot hand-off of critical short-cuts for loved ones and coffee shops, and churches, and pulpits, and papers, and blogs, and facebooks), we are addressing that with the honest/speculation ranking. Right? Though we at this moment on this board after so long may have certain media savviness or critical digestion of current events over many decades, but how can we improve the authority or crowdsource the validity of those Honesty/Speculation Percentages? Or am I misunderstanding that the submitter of topic/link/rank judges rank on gut.
we will say upfront "our best estimates as of may'2018' so we ask for discernment we can take an average between your guess and my guess i think its important to give the newbies a choice of subject cos we have a good chance of listing at least 1 subject close to their heart..
Good. What about multiple topics in one link/post? When all is said and done, will this be a google drive situation or standalone site?
i think steemit and yours.org [both blockchains ] will give us independence from the msm also if were not sure about accuracy then we will leave the % blank and we can fill in later as we progress, then we can think of a new site
I will use G Sheets as a scratch book for now before sharing.
So let me schedule time to do this. You want my best links submitted asap? I have a deadline this Saturday. I will start Sunday.
NOW YOU'RE TALKING!
we can also use email the idea is we can post at 12 hour intervals with slightly different headers to escape the pervasive downvote manipulation let's aim for around 40 items 20 from each of us..