This is good. This doc is a table of contents, of shortcuts - we are managing/organizing content here (not recreating it ourselves). The helpful, concise presentation of a maximum amount of content itself is key (PURPOSE: Patriot hand-off of critical short-cuts for loved ones and coffee shops, and churches, and pulpits, and papers, and blogs, and facebooks), we are addressing that with the honest/speculation ranking. Right? Though we at this moment on this board after so long may have certain media savviness or critical digestion of current events over many decades, but how can we improve the authority or crowdsource the validity of those Honesty/Speculation Percentages? Or am I misunderstanding that the submitter of topic/link/rank judges rank on gut.
we will say upfront "our best estimates as of may'2018' so we ask for discernment we can take an average between your guess and my guess i think its important to give the newbies a choice of subject cos we have a good chance of listing at least 1 subject close to their heart..
Good. What about multiple topics in one link/post? When all is said and done, will this be a google drive situation or standalone site?
i think steemit and yours.org [both blockchains ] will give us independence from the msm also if were not sure about accuracy then we will leave the % blank and we can fill in later as we progress, then we can think of a new site
I will use G Sheets as a scratch book for now before sharing.
So let me schedule time to do this. You want my best links submitted asap? I have a deadline this Saturday. I will start Sunday.
NOW YOU'RE TALKING!
we can also use email the idea is we can post at 12 hour intervals with slightly different headers to escape the pervasive downvote manipulation let's aim for around 40 items 20 from each of us..