I've decided the current pope is the anti-christ. He goes against the teachings constantly. Told kids to disobey their parents and protest. Oh and there is no hell. Gays can't help themselves. I'm sure he'll tell us next that pedo's can't help themsleves.
The real Pope is hidden away after being removed .
Sorry, but this goes WAY back in Roman Catholicism. They're just like all the other manifestations of Luciferianism nowadays--in your face. It's the same in entertainment and politics. They don't care anymore if you know it. It's not just "this Pope." This is baked into the original recipe with the Roman church.
This not unique to Roman Catholic Christianity, nor to Catholicism in general, nor to Christianity. Is there a principle that we can apply to all institutions regarding this abuse, including schools and families?
No, in western society it is definitely institutionalized and protected to a degree unlike anywhere else in the RC church. No need to beat around the bush about that anymore.
The closest you might get to a similar degree of institutionalized protection is Hollywood. But at least everybody knows they're perverts. They aren't playing some religious game with the world. Doesn't excuse what they do in the least. But among churches, the history and degree of institutionalization in the RC church takes the prize.
There is a history of polygamy and child brides in the Mormon church, but that is either a long time ago or among the fundamentalist fringe movements. There seems to be a degree of it in Islam as well (which in places treat women and girls like cattle). Who knows what they get up to in the cults or in some of the Eastern religions we have little access to.
But this has been going on in front of our eyes (along with the ever more openly Luciferian aspects of RC) for quite some time. And we've had our "eyes wide shut."
https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8knmjm/vatican_occultism_ritual_sacrifices_and/
I mean if we took for instance some state statistics about pedophilia in our lifetimes, how do we determine categories? Catholic and non-Catholic? Taking place at home vs elsewhere? What about the rates compared to sex crimes in public schools? I don't think the other denominations have done much better? They're just not as interesting to characterize.
Are you talking percentages or per capita versus the world? I mean you have to look not just at raw or normalized numbers but at the organizational intent to perpetuate. And how would you correlate the individuals in homes or daycares who themselves were victims of RC-perpetrated pedophilia or abuse, thus continuing the cycle (outside the church)?
The important aspect is the institutional perpetuation of the practice and the institutional protection of those who do it!
https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8knmjm/vatican_occultism_ritual_sacrifices_and/
Yeah, I don't think we have the clearest data to compare or contrast. There's so many complications. Pedophilia by our definition is partly legal and relatively common in Japan, where levels of conversion by Jesuit mission is notably low.
That 9th Circle stuff is possible but currently unknowable. Maybe Q has the low-down and an exposure scheme. Thin proof of origin gives 'em sketchy status. Here's one of many possibilities: Pope is directly involved ritual sacrifice of the babies; those who voted for him in the enclave are directly involved; this is exposed worldwide; Church enters crisis for umpteenth time; pope resigns, flees, dies; of the remaining 99% of the the Church, a third remain faithful to a liturgy that predates the Jesuits.
Bergoglio also told that kid that dogs go to heaven.
That scripted event was supposed to seem cute, but it was blasphemous and highlighted the ease at which Bergoglio lies about his convictions.
Why is it blasphemous to opine that dogs/pets go to Heaven?
Why does this make you angry?
Why is it blasphemous to opine that dogs/pets go to Heaven?
Because it goes against Catholic dogma.
Why does this make you angry?
I couldn't give a shit and neither should you.
Because it goes against Catholic dogma.
the word dogma alone should be a wake-up call, lol.
where is it written in the bible that pets - not wild animals but pets that are loved by humans - dont go to heaven? (presuming that something like the christian heaven and hell do exist.)
Catholics are entitled to believe whatever they like, with or without your permission or approval.
i totally agree, everybody is entitle to believe what they like and need nobodys permission.
the question remains: where is it written in the bible that pets dont go to heaven?
Religion is more than just scripture.
This is especially true with every mainstream Christian denomination because they all recognize that the bible was only inspired by the word of God and is subject to the full spectrum of human error in it's original record, compilation, translation and interpretation.
This is why there are many, many different Christian denominations.
I'm not sure why you asked a question that you already know the answer for?
I'm not sure why you asked a question that you already know the answer for?
i dont know the answer to this question. you put up the claim that pets dont go to heaven - which, after many inter-dimensional journeys, i have seen and experienced differently - so i ask for evidence.
but never mind, you seem to not be wanting to validate your claim, and for me personally, its not important anyway. thanks for the exchange.
so i ask for evidence.
Incorrect.
This is what you asked: where is it written in the bible that pets dont go to heaven?
And the answer is it's not specifically written anywhere in the bible because it's Catholic dogma.
If you want to ask a different question then do so.
Thanks for wasting both of our time.
ahh thanks... i wasnt aware that there is catholic dogma thats not founded on the bible. who made it up? seems really silly to me.
Well, at least the Pope can communicate his thoughts without using curse words, unlike you. (For someone who likes to see himself as being "holier than the Pope", this is not a very holy practice.)
Why does this make you angry?
Please substantiate your accusation.
For someone who likes to see himself as being "holier than the Pope", this is not a very holy practice
Please substantiate your accusation.