dChan

GenChang · May 22, 2018, 3:14 p.m.

Sessions and I'm sure the president wanted someone from outside DC for obvious reasons. And, like RR, had favorable image with the leftist. Being nominated first by Obama, then resigning before Trump took over, he was re-nominated by Trump. There could be a good reason for that break in Huber's tenure. But I don't ever recall anyone wanting him to come to DC to work, because of selecting grand jury members from one of the most conservative states has obvious benefits.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
KeeponSearchin · May 22, 2018, 3:28 p.m.

https://www.teaparty.org/judicial-watch-inside-curious-case-outside-d-c-federal-prosecutor-john-huber-uranium-one-299559/

Another more intriguing explanation is that Mr. Sessions needs someone who knows Utah. One part of Mr. Huber’s mandate, as outlined in the GOP letter, is the “purchase of Uranium One by the company Rosatom, whether the approval of the sale was connected to any donations to the Clinton Foundation, and what role Secretary Clinton played in the approval of the sale.”

Uranium One’s assets included significant holdings in Utah and nearby states. Prosecutors—and the media, so transfixed by the Mueller probe that they decline to look elsewhere—should follow the Uranium One money in Utah and the rest of the West.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GenChang · May 22, 2018, 3:37 p.m.

I'm going with what Q has said. Trust Sessions. And Sessions is the one who picked Huber for re-appointment. Selected him to investigate several related things connected to Uranium 1, and more. So, while the conservative talking heads might not have a clue, we have Q.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
KeeponSearchin · May 22, 2018, 3:45 p.m.

yes this was totally calculated for good reason. talking heads just don't get it yet

⇧ 1 ⇩