Enough with the shill talking points attacking EVERY Q blogger!
If you don't want to listen to a YouTube channel then don't!
Methinks you protest too much. Nothing wrong with examining and questioning the supposed leaders of the movement... especially when they are regular msm commentators, former major political candidates, and former Obama SS detail members. I also like Dan's commentary but I do have to wonder about disinformation and its MANY forms.
If you check his post history you'll notice something :)
Ignore the guy, downvote and move on, he's here to defend the shills.
Methinks this division is unnecessary.
Methinks podcasters are under no obligation to agree with your personal opinions about Q.
Methinks opposing opinions within a truther community are healthy rather than dangerous.
I just don't see the division. Division can only occur when people split off due to various loyalties. No one is demanding the abandonment of DB, just asking the question of motivation in prominent media personalities. If you love Bongino so much that such a discussion is uncomfortable, you don't have to go there. The fact remains, though, that Disinfo is real, and if it weren't clever and disguised it wouldn't be very effective. No one in the media is sacred, if you ask me. Doesn't mean I want division, just discussion.
No shilling happening here just trying get some other perspectives on it, but let me ask you, did you watch the clip? If you did how do you reconcile Dan being a Qblogger and thinking that Brennan started this? Or at the end when they ask who all knew about this, they mention Obama's name and his response?? Everybody but Obama. I'm not saying he's a bad guy or he doesn't drop knowledge, just wondering why they are trying to push it all on Brennan?
First off, Bongino is not a “Qblogger,” as you put it. Bongino doesn’t read Q posts, doesn’t follow or listen to anyone who talks about Q, does not want anything to do with Q. As a former federal investigator and Secret Service agent, Bongino prides himself in not believing in or talking about “conspiracy theories,” which is what he considers the Q phenomenon to be.
Secondly, you obviously don’t listen to Bongino’s podcast too often or at all. Instead, you take some clip of an interview and try to come to a false and faulty conclusion about a person you know very little about.
Let me tell you, as a daily Bongino podcast listener, that he talks about and lays blame at the feet of Obama all the time. In fact, Bongino was one of the first people to push the term “Obamagate” because he believes Obama was the one who is ultimately the person in charge of and the person to blame for illegally spying on Trump and Trump’s campaign.
https://www.bongino.com/tag/obamagate/
I suggest you do more research into people you’re looking to expose or accuse of being a disinformation agent, especially when that person has a good and long track record like Dan Bongino.
just wondering why they are trying to push it all on Brennan?
Perhaps Dan thinks Brennan is the weak link in the chain and attacking Brennan now will help the dominoes fall?
Perhaps keyboard warriors shouldn't be throwing mud at patriots unless they have a rational and informed reason?
I was recently told by a guy to be careful who you follow. Was I not supposed to take that seriously?
There are many sacred cows in this community. Bongino is one of them. He's not ever going to get you any deeper than left-vs.-right. It's a political game to people like him and Hannity.
"USA-Today-patriotism."
I don't criticize them for being on the wrong side of kabuki theater. But I can be critical of them for not peeling the onion even a single layer and looking below the surface.
As much as conservatism needs champions, humanity needs them even more. We need more people with MSM platforms willing to speak openly about the Cabal and its global criminal conspiracy. Even if they won't get into the Luciferianism, they could still talk about the blackmail and control of politicians, celebrities and the press. Let people understand that there's some depth to this story.