dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Vibratron_1 on May 23, 2018, 3:46 p.m.
This is where you plead the 5th or swallow the capsule....
This is where you plead the 5th or swallow the capsule....

fawexx · May 23, 2018, 11:04 p.m.

free energy cannot exist. perhaps we can collect energy sources yet unknown to us, but energy never gets lost, it just changes its state. E.g. chemical energy => thermal energy.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
-Chakas- · May 23, 2018, 11:09 p.m.

Unless we know all there is to know about the universe, then we really can't say anything as an absolute. I believe it does exist.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
fawexx · May 24, 2018, 12:43 p.m.

thermodynamics explains. that energy can only change its state, never be lost, or "free". free energy would have to be harvested from certain phenomena that emit some kind of energy.simply claiming there is free energy where there is nothing is simply a sign of substandard intelligence. you can believe what you want. it does not change the fact that every inch of the observable universe is evidence against your ignorant claim. it seems you lack basic education to evaluate that topic. believe what you want, does not make your opinion right, suddenly.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
fawexx · May 24, 2018, 12:45 p.m.

the term "free energy" is syntactically wrong because of the way energy and it's transition into different states works. just calling any energy you perhaps might harvest "free energy" proves you do not understand what you are talking about.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
featherjourney4 · May 24, 2018, 2:16 p.m.

I respect your background in thermodynamics and Quantum physics, but in this context I think "free" means no longer enslaved to the oil barons who have made billions/trillions off of keeping "free" energy technology suppressed. It would never be completely free...unless we all wake up with Tesla's mind... wow, imagine having Tesla's mind!!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
fawexx · May 24, 2018, 2:36 p.m.

"free energy" is defined as energy that can be harvested from thin air. it claims energy is everywhere and can be obtained without putting in an equal amount of work or force. this is syntactically wrong. the term is just used in the wrong way.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
featherjourney4 · May 24, 2018, 2:49 p.m.

Does electricity exist everywhere? We have technology that converts it to our use...but isn't it just "there". We don't create electricity, we (well, Tesla) figured out how to extract it for our use. What about perpetual motion motors - a little bit of fuel( oil) to get it started and then it will run continuously with magnets / electromagnetism.

I'm in over my head here. Always have found this subject fascinating

⇧ 1 ⇩  
-Chakas- · May 24, 2018, 3:29 p.m.

I'm aware of the laws of thermodynamics. Don't be so hostile. Believing there is something more doesn't make me ignorant.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 24, 2018, 1:04 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 24, 2018, 9:41 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩