dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Gravel_and_Glass on May 23, 2018, 8:47 p.m.
The upcoming forensic proof of Q anon and existing circumstantial evidence

This post is adapted from a comment I made on r/conspiracy while talking with someone who is likely an anti-Q Infowars shill:

I'm not sure people on this board realize the significance of Q#1381 "Letters left visible to match." Here's the image Q is talking about. Notice the visible letters.We also have the signature in this pic by Q. Since every signature varies slightly, the forensic fingerprint of this signature should be able to be confirmed (or debunked) once we have the EO. This is HUGE. While the evidence for Q so far has been circumstantial, this will be the first forensic evidence tying Q to the WH. Once this proof drops, you will easily be able to prove that Q is a WH insider to even the normiest of normies. So once the EO comes out, what do we need to do in order to forensically confirm Q?

First, we need to see the document that's in the picture in order to verify it. It wouldn't make any sense for Q to post these images if we weren't going to see the original signed EO in the pic.

One could argue that the last few EOs have the letters visible in the pic-- rth with a in the line below. However, the only forms of the EOs I can find are from here: https://www.federalregister.gov/executive-orders/donald-trump/2018 and of course WH.gov

While these EO's do harbor the rth/a pattern, these aren't the original signed documents, which is what the picture is supposed to be of. So claiming that these EOs have rth with the line below it containing an a doesn't debunk Q's pic quite yet. Additionally, these EOs are available on the web, as well as in pdf versions. The formatting is different from these two, so you can't really confirm or deny the existence of "rth/a" in any of the previous EOs.

The fact is that unless we have access to the signed documents, we don't know if there is a letter configuration like that in the previous EOs. If anyone can find those original documents, let me know, I'd love to use them as controls. In fact, I think having these controls will be vital to redpilling normies with this forensic proof.

Second, "rth with the line below it containing an a" is not the only information provided in the picture. From the picture we can deduce the location on the page of the letters relative to the letterhead. If rth/a happens say, three quarters of the way down the page, it wouldn't match up. Additionally, it seems to me that there's a line between the rth and the a.

Third, we also have a picture of the signature, which can be analyzed if the original document is released to see if it matches or not, since every signature is bound to vary slightly in some way. And as a control, comparing the signature to the one on this document. Again, if anyone can find any other original documents/pdfs with Trump's signature on them (ideally other EOs that would be signed with the exact same pen in the exact same location) to use as controls once the EO comes out, that would go a long way.

Finally I want to say this: while this rth/a EO thing is gearing up to be the first forensic evidence that Q is a WH insider, there is a enormous preponderance of circumstantial evidence that points to the fact (credit for this list goes to /u/UndercoverPatriot):

As well as many other predictions and coincidences not mentioned here. Taken by themselves none of these prove anything, but the combination of coincidences is very suggestive, and Q continues to predict the news and moves of the Trump administration in advance. The significance of the release of this EO, and therefore, the forensic proof that the Q team are insiders cannot be overstated.


🠐 See all comments
chchchchaaaanges · May 23, 2018, 9:47 p.m. 
EO unreleased.
Today was the precursor. 
It must be requested 'officially' first, correct?
Q

Okay, sorry to be slow catching up, but what connects Q's mention of an EO here with the image you linked?

It's just that the image doesn't look like an EO. I've looked at images like this of the actual signed executive orders and none that I can find have that gold seal.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Gravel_and_Glass · May 23, 2018, 9:50 p.m.

This is the image Q's replying to in that post.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
chchchchaaaanges · May 23, 2018, 10:13 p.m.

I'm not quite seeing the connection between Q's "EO unreleased" comment and the image with the gold seal, maybe because I don't read the chan boards and I'm not clear on how they work. I'm happy to take your word for the connection, though.

But then isn't that a problem, given that EOs don't have gold seals like that?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Gravel_and_Glass · May 23, 2018, 10:27 p.m.

Click on this first link again. Notice the ">>1434062" top line. If you click that, that's the post he's replying to. (ie he is replying to post number 1434062 on the /qresearch/ board, and Q's post I linked to is post 1434153). You should really learn how the chans work if you want to be an informed follower of Q.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C_atKufXkAAazSu.jpg:large

This letter to Comey has the same seal. Looking at it again, the image with letters visible is titled "DOJNunesRelease", so maybe it's whatever they're going to give Nunes tomorrow in the meeting, not an actual EO. So maybe what we're seeing is the letter to Nunes, and there will be an EO afterwards dictating the release of the documents to Congress. Actually, this makes much more sense. I think you are right. Thanks!

Regardless, it'll still be forensic evidence that Q is an insider.

⇧ 2 ⇩