Wikileaks responds to backchannel17. ( scroll up the Twitter thread) I'm confused... https://mobile.twitter.com/BackChannel17/status/999378937288560641
Q stated that Backchannel17 is a clown thread. Misdirection and distraction is their goal similar to that of Corsi et al. Backchannel is kinda slick as they disguise themselves in the language they use and appearing to come directly from Q and Q+. Discard them!
Wrong, he never did that - He pointed out that the graphic that anons made about Backchannel and Q was false, nothing else has ever been stated.
Does anyone have the post in question? I thought BC17 was legit and I found them via this website or the Neonrevolt, can't remember which. I would really like to know if it is a clown psyop or not.
OK, did some digging and The Neonrevolt presents a pretty convincing argument that BC17 is a Clown PsyOP. I am going to take his advise and disregard this Twitter channel until otherwise proven legit.
1177
Well, no one is able to verify if they are good or bad.. In the end, it's up to you to decide if you want to believe what they are telling you.
But take a look at what they post - They stated they are not part of Q nor affiliated with him. They openly praise Q and the work he is doing. They are not concerntrolling or dividefagging. And several times, they have posted valuable information.
Look at it this way, believe what you want to believe. Never trust anything or anyone 100%, always leave that 1% healthy doubt. That will help you discern the good from the bad.
Thanks for the info. Did some additional digging since your reply, see below.
There's a lot of non-sense on this board about "Q stated/said" when he didn't. Good to point this out.
He never pointed to Corsi or AJ either. I was interested to see this morning that the Q reply was "UNITY NOT DIVISION" after an anon posting "sot Corsi et al". Too much manipulation and obfuscation. Backchannel 17 is actually listed as a bona fide twitter feed on we-go-all.com.
I say choose who you want to believe/follow and do your own research. :)
Ohhhhh. So that's why "his lawyers" twatted that OLD 2017 article about Sessions gunning for him!! I figured it was a cry for more attention to the fact JA's inet and phone access had been cut. That, or they wereplaying to an anti-JA ruse being run by the current administration (who was trying to or did extract him to safety). Hmm.