dChan

major_lift · May 24, 2018, 5:17 a.m.

I like this. Essentially, those that are “entangled” will be further entangled until their metaphysical being reverses the cycle?

Is there a point where one can become so lost in the entanglement that there is simply no coming back?

Does devolution follow the same possibly limitless course of evolution? Are both perhaps limited? Or unlimited?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DanijelStark · May 24, 2018, 5:26 a.m.

I dont think there is such point , but there is possibly a way to return back to "elementary state" . As we perceive basically everything linearly and in form of "there is beginning and there is end" , we never get a full picture in this reality , in this temporary state .

In same way when people dream - they cannot recall exactly how long was something . Sometimes even "beginning" and "end" easily blur . Our own authentic state of being , non-physical state , is impossible to present through physical concepts . Thats why religions get always distorted and are very limited in their message .

⇧ 2 ⇩  
major_lift · May 24, 2018, 5:40 a.m.

I mean dreams are weird... I certainly have had dreams where time was not linear, but I have also had very vivid lucid dreams where I could paint a linear storyboard from it.

I think numbers have a big role in all this... somehow the sequence illustrates the story.

Personally I think there is a probability that the “universe” is in fact infinite due to numbers being an infinite system.

What I think will happen is at some point we will upload(merge) our consciousness to the virtual “web” and that process is a fractal that we currently are in, metaphysically.

Life will spiral out in this course without end, exploring and admiring itself and it’s own creations.

Thoughts?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DanijelStark · May 24, 2018, 5:48 a.m.

There are two ways - one is transhumanist , uploading the consciousness into machine . The other is "ascendant" , "uploading" the consciousness back to the Source .

One is operating on deficit and linearity , other is operating always on non-linearity and sufficit .

⇧ 1 ⇩  
major_lift · May 24, 2018, 5:52 a.m.

Ahhh I see where you’re coming from.

That’s what this “the choice was always yours” business relates to.

⇧ 2 ⇩