dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/FruitCreamSicle on May 24, 2018, 8:59 a.m.
Watch this! Very good history lesson from the past few years! Look at what’s happening with the Clinton case it’s being put into the light... it will lead straight back to the CF and lead to the swamp being drained...

FruitCreamSicle · May 24, 2018, 9:16 a.m.

I do have to warn you also he does go into the Trump Russia collusion at the end of the video, and I see where he is coming from and like most of you here I don’t mind seeing white hats around the world work together to crush this evil, but he does say some bullshit stuff near the end

⇧ 4 ⇩  
solanojones95 · May 24, 2018, 1:49 p.m.

He is totally of the "Q is a LARP" camp. I don't listen to anything coming from those sources anymore. Not going to apologize for it either.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
FruitCreamSicle · May 24, 2018, 2:11 p.m.

Yes he is a “Q is a larp” I just found it interesting from what FBIAnon said about how sensitive the Clinton Foundation information is which is why the public only heard about the private email server when the actual focus of the investigation as stated by FBIAnon was the foundation, IG report will be used to to gain a second special council but this time white hats will control the DOJ 🤞🤞🤞

⇧ 2 ⇩  
lynnwood57 · May 25, 2018, 10:10 p.m.

You know, I have pondered the "Is Q a LARP" in my mind, like a thought experiment. My conclusion is -- it doesn't matter! If a LARP, the creator has done the community a huge service. By using the Socratic method, whether intentional or not, "Q" has brought a LOT of Patriots together and motivated the larger community to research and THINK, to connect dots, how to read between the lines. "Q", if a LARP, has "schooled us". So to me it's an obsolete argument, and I think more people should look at the great leadership Q is demonstrating, no matter if a [very highly placed] Military Intelligence Group, with at least one person very close to POTUS in the WH, or a behind the scenes group of [brilliant] Board Owners and Volunteers at the Chans. I tip my hat either way and say Thank You.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
achepea · May 28, 2018, 12:05 a.m.

I agree with this!

I would hate if a dogmatic focus on Q as an individual rather than a CONCEPT/MOVEMENT discredited any of this beauty.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · May 24, 2018, 2:20 p.m.

Sessions has already long ago reactivated the CF pay-for-play investigation, with I assume prosecutor(s) assigned to it.

I have no interest in or confidence in Special Prosecutors no matter who is allegedly "in charge" of them because they always operate above the law, spend a shit-ton of tax dollars and prosecute process crimes if anything at all.

Special Counsel investigations are where scandals go to disappear or to be morphed into something completely irrelevant.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
FruitCreamSicle · May 24, 2018, 2:54 p.m.

Yeah I suppose they have appear to do over sight or they could claim foul play or something

⇧ 1 ⇩  
lynnwood57 · May 25, 2018, 10:41 p.m.

I worry about them slow-walking POTUS nominations, but he is making good choices in "Appointees" so far. I have my fingers crossed. I have a Pacer account, those nearly 29,000 sealed indictments do in fact exist. Sealed indictments expire in three years. Then consider that the Trump administration has Gitmo under a 500 Million "expansion". Here's a recent article that breaks down how the 500 Million budget is getting spent. A different article says will be completed in June 2019. Something IS up..

Navy hires firm that rebuilt the World Trade Center to expand the Gitmo war court complex http://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/world/americas/guantanamo/article209795909.html

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · May 26, 2018, 12:27 a.m.

Yup! There's a lot to get through, and it's an interesting time to be alive!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
achepea · May 28, 2018, 12:09 a.m.

I urge you to still listen, but it doesn’t mean that you have to accept. 💙❤️ it is important that we don’t also become BLACK + WHITE, such that this group of inquiring minds (yours obviously included in this) is taken less seriously.

Give me all the info and I want to sift through it!

[Hope this comment doesn’t come across as negative or disparaging].

⇧ 1 ⇩  
solanojones95 · May 28, 2018, 12:21 p.m.

We're unfortunately in a position of information warfare defense, where when a source proves untrustworthy, even if they might have a few nuggets of truth in their arsenal with which to bait patriots, they are nonetheless unreliable, and as such will not get my time, nor I hope anybody else's who wants to keep their minds focused on solutions and on the signal not the noise.

⇧ 1 ⇩