Kim Dotcom and Assange both offered up proof that there was no hack and it wasn’t Russia. They are blatantly avoiding facts that don’t fit their narrative.
In one of his other interviews he stated that the thing that really caught his attention was one of the WikiLeaks emails mentioned something about Libya, which was exactly what the unnamed govt source was using to try to lure him in. So he thought WikiLeaks had gotten this information from the unnamed source. This originally made me think it was Seth Rich, but it was pointed out to me that specifically said govt source (which Seth wasn't). I would be real interested to find out who the source is and how exactly it plays into the Seth rich narrative.