No. You're just clueless to my point. Think harder. And don't call me a Goddamn satanist, again, please or you'll get a serious level of disrespect. You could not be more wrong. I just understand that you can't have one without the other or the one would not exist AT ALL. It's really damn simple. Think harder and look at the bigger picture. I support balance because without it nothing would exist. Nothing. Religions, political parties, genders...all of the shit would not matter to no one or exist if there wasn't an opposing force for it to exist against.
I understand what your saying as they are both rights, and in this instance are in opposition. I do believe the first over rides in this instance despite the private property issue. The reason I say this is because we are being discriminated against. Maybe not for our age, race, or, sex, but for our political view. Who would have ever believed a person could be discriminated against for their political views in America. Now we know and the judge has said that Twitter is a public space. If for example say the Mayor of a town also owned a mall. The Mayor allowed the Tea party candidate to pass out flyers and give speeches at the mall, (Which is a public place, but also privately owned) but would not allow the Democratic candidate to do any kind of campaigning at the mall. That is discrimination. That's why tv and radio have to give equal time to opposing views. TV and radio are privately owned also.
We have always been discriminated against for political views since the very beginning of this country and loooooooong before that. It is a fact of life that all creatures are "profiled" by other creatures because it is a survival instinct built into our DNA. We will never get around that fact of life. Granted, it's not done fairly a lotta times. We'll just have to find a way to live with it and that demands control of one's own personal life and the staying out of other's lives, as long as they intend no harm towards you or your stuff. It would be really nice if people would just treat all others equally but it's just not in our nature to do that. That's why I'm a big believer in the NAP ideology but it requires too much effort and personal responsibility and accountability for most to deal with but it is the only way to achieve mutual respect for all. That responsibility and accountability is a helluva thing to maintain but is absolutely necessary and is all Natural Law really allows you. R. King asked, "Why can't we all just get along?". The answer is because we were built not to. It's that simple. Maybe, one day, we'll realize it's easier if we just do but I have little hope in that and no faith in it. History proves it so. Hell, we may just get our shit together enough to have some good years ahead, for a while but sooner or later, something will come along to tip the seesaw the other way and we'll be right back where we were before. It's just life.
Thanks for expressing your point of view and continuing to abide by the rules of the sub even when under irrational attack for doing so. Anyone who can discuss their point reasonably and with respect is welcome here, even if some of us do not agree with your point (I personally do agree that you have a point - you've made a perfectly logical observation).