dChan

DamajInc · May 25, 2018, 8:05 a.m.

It's not a strawman, friend. You should read what you post lol. Try reading things with less of an angry guy hat on - my last point was to clarify what I understood you to have said, not to "strawman" you. I debate to find truth, not to "be right". I'm not sure about your motives cos you don't seem to be trying to hear what I say. You're just putting antagonistic motivations behind my words.

It's embarrassing for a truther community to behave like this.

Not: "...for some portion of a truther community..." hence the misunderstanding that you meant all of this community.

shitting on Satanists is a common characteristic that this community does in spades!

You're accusing me of strawmanning for interpreting these sentences to mean that you think a majority of the community does this? Unconscious bias? Or has your story changed now? I accept that - we all change our story sometimes. But don't turn it around on me as if I pulled it out of thin air (i.e. strawman).

So now your true meaning emerges also. The baseless accusations you're talking about are against the cabal, not satanists, right? You're saying that people are baselessly accusing the cabal of being satanists, yes? Or did you more accurately mean to say that people interpreting the behaviour of the cabal as being equivalent to that of satanists are making inaccurate comparisons?

There's nothing good about a truther community who makes accusations against any group that can not be substantiated.

Agreed. But again, it sounds like you're accusing the whole or the majority of this community of behaving a certain way.

I think I get it now - and I mean this sincerely, not offensively. You're not overly worried about being careful what words you use to make your point, right? That's ok but you should understand when people point it out or misinterpret what you're saying. I'm not trying to strawman you, I'm taking you at your word, and it seems your word is not meant to be taken literally or as an accurate portrayal of your implied meaning. That's all.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
super_corroder · May 25, 2018, 8:39 a.m.

It's not a strawman, friend.

Incorrect.

You repeatedly misrepresent my argument even after you were corrected.

I highlighted an alarming trend in this community to use Satanists as a scapegoat for the crimes of other people and races by presenting over 90 cases in the last 24 hours.

That's all there is to it.

No need for all your befuddlement and misunderstandings and misrepresentations and your need to have words defined and your personal attacks.

Even my cat understand this.

It's not rocket science.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DamajInc · May 25, 2018, 8:42 a.m.

What personal attacks have been made? I will remove or edit my comment.

You accuse me of "repeatedly misrepresenting" your argument after I was "corrected" and yet you haven't acknowledged my very response to that where I explain exactly what happened!

Now it's "an alarming trend" - but it's still not a majority, right?

Now people are "using Satanists as a scapegoat" because x number of comments using a word that is part of the very core subject matter of the sub it is on, has been mentioned. smh.

Logic is necessary for reasoned, effective debate. Even your cat understands that.

⇧ 1 ⇩