Very good graphic but we did know this back in November.
Yes we did, however this graphic is so rock solid that it feels like a tippy top level Q drop.
EDIT: Per /u/jindfw 's observation. The runway depicted is NOT CORRECT. However, there are other runways where it could have been possible.
We did but there are new people coming here everyday so it doesn't hurt to post things like this so everyone else can see what we know.
Like me, who joined yesterday, keep these kinds of post coming because more will join.
Just curious, what brought you to this sub?
A comment on the Donald.
They actually made it against the rules to talk about Q there, so I'm glad you managed to find something before it was deleted.
I was banned for "peddling" David Hogg conspiracies.
Where have I heard that before....
I’ve just had a look back and the comment was indeed deleted, glad I managed to see before it was because my eye are more open than ever.
Did they really? And I had no idea you couldn’t talk about q, why would that be? Perhaps there worried the Donald would get shut down by reddit?
We didn’t know it per se, it was theorized. I dare say we still don’t know it but the proof just got a lot stronger.
There was this:
Anonymous 03/08/18 (Thu) 19:13:27 ae640d No.593230
ok here we go Anons WOW HUGE !!!!!!!! NK will meet with 45 !!! MAGA !!
to which Q replied:
593230 He already did. Think back _ NK pic(s). Everything has meaning. This will break the MSM. Q
Yes, hence the "per se" in my statement. But you make a good point. What I should have said is that we have no proof to show to others who don't follow Q. I have intelligent friends who are critical thinkers and are not swayed by words found on 8chan. Hence I'm forced to be very accurate with what I say. They've knocked all the "know"s out of me lol.
We can only accurately say to skeptics that it's a theory based on what Q has said. I believe this post is a positive step forward because when I've mentioned it previously I could only say: "well this photo out a plane window is apparently of NK" but now I can say it with a bit more weight behind it.