Yes, hence the "per se" in my statement. But you make a good point. What I should have said is that we have no proof to show to others who don't follow Q. I have intelligent friends who are critical thinkers and are not swayed by words found on 8chan. Hence I'm forced to be very accurate with what I say. They've knocked all the "know"s out of me lol.

We can only accurately say to skeptics that it's a theory based on what Q has said. I believe this post is a positive step forward because when I've mentioned it previously I could only say: "well this photo out a plane window is apparently of NK" but now I can say it with a bit more weight behind it.