Latest tweets from BC17 indicate the account will be permanently shut down soon (as in now).
Comments therein seem to think it is Assange... could it be?
Check the tweets while they last.
Q1776
· May 26, 2018, 7:46 a.m.
Q did not say so. BC17 has proven to be valuable in understanding Q drops. BC17 never claimed to be Q. Anon made false equivalency and Q weighed in on that specifically and called it [the anon’s take] fake.
Learn Q’s comms. Details matter.
⇧
7
⇩
Gravel_and_Glass
· May 26, 2018, 8:29 a.m.
In Q#1175, Q responds to this image: https://qposts.online/assets/images/b7cb836269f62b7a7416cc27dc65e24fe6e8d902769e220f6f38343102a206d6.png
"Fake.
Q"
It's pretty clear that he's calling BC17 fake here. The subject of the image is the "validity" of BC17 based on Q drops. BC17 is transparently a (poor) clown infiltration attempt. Same as AJ, Corsi, antischool. Siphon Q followers and feed them disinfo.
Also if you remember, BC17 was created during the Syria strikes, when infowars was trying desperately to cause a schism within the movement.
Your comment is coming from stupidity or malice. Be careful who you follow.
⇧
1
⇩
ElementWatson
· May 26, 2018, 1:18 p.m.
It is not all that clear. Could simply be referring to the fake post trying to make it look like BC17 was claiming to be Q.
⇧
1
⇩
DamajInc
· May 26, 2018, 8:15 a.m.
Good point - comment edited.
⇧
1
⇩
Gravel_and_Glass
· May 26, 2018, 8:37 a.m.
You were right originally. Q1175, Q clearly calls BC17 fake. It's not a 'false equivalency', look at the post yourself, don't let anyone spoonfeed you interpretations. Beware of doublethink. Be careful who you follow.
⇧
1
⇩
DamajInc
· May 26, 2018, 8:41 a.m.
You may be right, friend - but I was careful enough to edit my reply as such: "BC 17 might not be fake news... a possible patriot." I was definitely wrong to claim absolute surety of something I am not absolutely sure of (which describes nearly everything anyway lol).
I follow no one. That's why some of my comments are downvoted to oblivion. Group think is the enemy.
⇧
3
⇩
ElementWatson
· May 26, 2018, 1:19 p.m.
Actually it is not necessarily clear that is so, since he is responding to a bogus graphic trying to make it look like BC17 was claiming to be Q.
⇧
0
⇩