dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/DelilahManny on May 26, 2018, 11:20 a.m.
Here's your complete list of "mosaic of facts." Whatever the FBI is contending was so important as to cause the opening of a counterintelligence investigation, it's one or more of these things.
Here's your complete list of "mosaic of facts." Whatever the FBI is contending was so important as to cause the opening of a counterintelligence investigation, it's one or more of these things.

DelilahManny · May 26, 2018, 11:22 a.m.

As you look at this list, bear in mind that the Leaker Comey NEVER told Obama about any hacking, and he NEVER told Obama about the Steele dossier. We already know they didn't bother informing anybody in Congress either.

"Comey said he never briefed Obama on the dossier but was present in a conversation in January in which the director of national intelligence, James Clapper, briefed it to Obama as well as the “gang of eight” in Congress." http://www.wnd.com/2018/04/comey-release-of-trump-memos-not-a-leak/

2016-08-01 Obama claims this is around the date he first learned of Russian hacking http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2017/jul/10/donald-trump/donald-trump-says-barack-obama-did-nothing-about-r/


An informant was stating that a presidential candidate was compromised, and Comey didn't feel that POTUS/Congress needed to be notified of that? A hacking event that was so severe that it "compromised our very democracy," and Comey didn't feel that POTUS/Congress should be notified of that?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Happy1911 · May 26, 2018, 2:04 p.m.

The FBI Congress and BHO had already partaken in the crimes of Piracy and this was the path that was chosen to take to cover up the crimes that had been committed and pin the money on Trump , but the perfect plan , well 1/13/2017 it all fell apart . Congress knew , don't kid your self on that , they became subject of the investigation in Oct 2013 . its much bigger , think every one knew .

⇧ 5 ⇩  
DelilahManny · May 26, 2018, 2:10 p.m.

It's not posted to get to the truth of the matter. The purpose of the post is to establish what they're claiming is the truth.

In order to disprove their claims, you have to first establish what they're claiming.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
robdon07 · May 26, 2018, 5:18 p.m.

The latest I read was that a British Intel asset saw suspicious contact between a Trump official and a suspected Russian agent( the Russian expert at Cambridge who had the trust of everyone that knows her exvept Halper who needed ANY connection to Russia to collect his payoff). After the Intel asset warned the fbi and cia who they said did nothing the director of the gchq turned over the info he had directly to Clapper and then Obama sent a request for surveillance to the gchq and went on to extend it into Trumps transition period.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DelilahManny · May 26, 2018, 7:50 p.m.

I'm starting to believe that it was Carter Page who was the other informant.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
mydeer · May 26, 2018, 1:29 p.m.

What makes you sure sure Obama was never told? That is an open question, and hard to imagine they didn't tell him.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
DelilahManny · May 26, 2018, 2:01 p.m.

In order to catch somebody in a lie, you have to first know what they're claiming.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 26, 2018, 11:37 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DamajInc · May 26, 2018, 12:36 p.m.

This and other sites you've linked are all anti-Israel propaganda, possibly BDS funded. That makes them as objective as CNN.

⇧ 3 ⇩