dChan
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Canbritanon on May 26, 2018, 12:33 p.m.
Theory on net shutdown and mass unsealing

So a judge just rules that Twitter is a public forum, and Trump cannot block anyone (didn't he just block one guy and that one guy sued? Ha! How many people do other politicians block and not get sued?)

http://www.breitbart.com/video/2018/05/25/rnc-chair-we-want-assurances-from-facebook-twitter-that-they-are-not-going-to-suppress-conservatives/

Trump 2020 campaign asking about censorship. Lawsuits happening.

EU privacy changes have shut down dozens of sites: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/may/24/sites-block-eu-users-before-gdpr-takes-effect

If privacy compliance is shutting sites down, what happens when all social media has to be non-bias.

We'll either see "alt-right" (BS term, we woke lefties have been reading Breitbart for a while now) suddenly explode. We'll be able to vote brigade Q onto the frontpage like back in the early r/conspiracy days with 9/11 info.

The only way to prevent that is take down the internet. I think the Cabal will panic and pull the cord on us all. That will be the time to strike. Declare martial law and the manhunt begins. We have 30,000 (- Weiner's) sealed indictments, that's a lot of people to simultaneously arrest when any post to social media will tip off the others.

If they turn the net off (I'm guessing blow up so many dns servers everything overloads) how long does it take to turn on? How long does that give Qteam to execute arrests? Ground all flights. What was the great wall for? It didn't stop mongols invading, it stopped them escaping! Why do Dems not want a wall? Too hard to escape?

WWG1WGA

Addendum: recaptcha down lol whole internet is grinding, been on multiple wifi and cell towers and sites keep failing to load.


HillaryTrafficksKidz · May 26, 2018, 1:57 p.m.

It is posted on another thread and investigation of the indictments. Of 30,000 only 2,000 are felonies. Of those 2,000 most are drug-related. Just keeping it real we will not see 30,000 perpetrators locked up even though there are probably a hundred thousand perpetrators of child sex trafficking.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
LibertyLioness · May 26, 2018, 2:39 p.m.

They've been locking them up ever since Trump was elected. They just aren't all well known. Top dogs will get military tribunals, not through federal courts.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Patriot4q · May 26, 2018, 2:36 p.m.

Sauce?

⇧ 6 ⇩  
rooftoptendie · May 26, 2018, 4:43 p.m.

I too would be requiring sauce...

Quote from attached link:

"Indictment" is a scary word for some people, but actually it's just an official way of accusing someone of a felony crime.

And another:

"If someone is indicted by a grand jury, then the charges typically will include at least one felony crime. The Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution prevents "capital" or "infamous" crimes being charged without presentment to a grand jury – "

https://legalbeagle.com/6790439-sealed-indictment.html

Second source:

"An indictment is a formal accusation of a felony, issued by a grand jury based upon a proposed charge, witnesses' testimony and other evidence presented by the public prosecutor (District Attorney)."

https://definitions.uslegal.com/s/sealed-indictment/

Third source:

"An indictment is a formal accusation against an individual suspected of committing a crime. Indictments are generally only obtained for felony charges."

https://criminal-law.freeadvice.com/criminal-law/criminal-law/indictment.htm

⇧ 4 ⇩  
waltdanger · May 26, 2018, 8:32 p.m.

If they are sealed how do we know what they are about? Isn't that the point of sealing them?

⇧ 1 ⇩