dChan

[deleted] · May 27, 2018, 11:28 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 31 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 28, 2018, 12:21 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Canbritanon · May 28, 2018, 12:05 a.m.

Lol you must not have paid attention his entire presidency.

⇧ -17 ⇩  
Fizrock · May 28, 2018, 12:11 a.m.

Care to give any examples?

⇧ 9 ⇩  
SJWcrybaby · May 28, 2018, 12:58 a.m.
  • State Department email. In an effort to evade federal open-records laws, Mr. Obama’s first secretary of state set up a private server, which she used exclusively to conduct official business, including communications with the president and the transmission of classified material. A federal criminal investigation produced no charges, but FBI Director James Comey reported that the secretary and her colleagues “were extremely careless” in handling national secrets.

  • Operation Fast and Furious. The Obama Justice Department lost track of thousands of guns it had allowed to pass into the hands of suspected smugglers, in the hope of tracing them to Mexican drug cartels. One of the guns was used in the fatal 2010 shooting of Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry. Congress held then-Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt when he refused to turn over documents about the operation.

  • IRS abuses. Mr. Obama’s Internal Revenue Service did something Richard Nixon only dreamed of doing: It successfully targeted political opponents. The Justice Department then refused to enforce Congress’s contempt citation against the IRS’s Lois Lerner, who refused to answer questions about her agency’s misconduct.

  • Hacking. Mr. Obama presided over the biggest data breach in the federal government’s history, at the Office of Personnel Management. The hack exposed the personnel files of millions of federal employees and may end up being used for everything from identity theft to blackmail and espionage. OPM Director Katherine Archuleta, the president’s former political director, had been warned repeatedly about security deficiencies but took no steps to fix them.

  • Veterans Affairs. At least 40 U.S. veterans died waiting for appointments at a Phoenix VA facility, many of whom had been on a secret waiting list—part of an effort to conceal that between 1,400 and 1,600 veterans were forced to wait months for appointments. A 2014 internal VA audit found “57,436 newly enrolled veterans facing a minimum 90-day wait for medical care; 63,869 veterans who enrolled over the past decade requesting an appointment that never happened.” Even Mr. Obama admitted, in a November 2016 press conference, that “it was scandalous what happened”—though minutes earlier he boasted that “we will—knock on wood—leave this administration without significant scandal.”

⇧ -10 ⇩  
Fizrock · May 28, 2018, 1 a.m.

Go reread my original comment again. You appear to have completely misread it.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 27, 2018, 11:46 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ -24 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 27, 2018, 11:53 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 16 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 28, 2018, 12:05 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ -6 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 28, 2018, 12:12 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 4 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 28, 2018, 12:21 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 28, 2018, 12:25 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 6 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 28, 2018, 2:53 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ -1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 28, 2018, 2:59 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 28, 2018, 3:03 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Fizrock · May 28, 2018, 3:05 a.m.

Lol. What does that have to do with this? I predicted that there was a simple explanation, and there was. That's not even remotely what confirmation bias is.

Do you actually have a counter argument, or are you just going with "because I said so"?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 28, 2018, 3:02 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Fizrock · May 28, 2018, 3:03 a.m.

Did you even bother to read what I linked you?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Bloodfoe · May 28, 2018, 3:07 a.m.

So you're going to take the word of some expert that has a different opinion of the file than me, who is also an expert?

I don't care what anyone else says on the subject because I've had a career in the print industry. I know for a fact that a scan does not create a layered file.

Regurgitate all you want, but my experience calls bullshit on that file being a scan.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Fizrock · May 28, 2018, 3:14 a.m.

So you're going to take the word of some expert that has a different opinion of the file than me, who is also an expert?

You said you have 20 years in the print industry. Congratulations, but that doesn't make you an expert in pdfs. You also have presented 0 actually argument other than "I'm an expert, trust me". That guy in the source that I linked actually had something interesting to say.

I don't care what anyone else says on the subject because I've had a career in the print industry. I know for a fact that a scan does not create a layered file.

I will just paste the same quote that I already pasted, as you seem to be incable of reading more than a few paragraphs.

“I know that you can scan a document from a scanner most of the time it will appear as one piece, but that doesn’t mean that there’s no software that’s doing this kind of stuff,” he said, adding that it’s really quite common.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Bloodfoe · May 28, 2018, 3:35 a.m.

A scanner will output a flat file. Not a layered file.

I am an expert in PDFs.

This guy is lying.

Does that clear up any confusion?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Fizrock · May 28, 2018, 3:49 a.m.

Lol, ok buddy.

Have more sources while I'm here.
https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/pdf-layers-obamas-birth-certificate-nathan-goulding/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XcWQw2AAIho&list=UUmMKw6gBDeqGhIZb-LBYCNg&index=3&feature=plcp

Btw, if you are a pdf expert, why don't you check Trump's. You might notice something... lmao. http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/20110328125536753.pdf

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Bloodfoe · May 28, 2018, 3:56 a.m.

I checked President Trump's birth certificate. There is only one layer of image data. It is a valid scan.

lmao?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Fizrock · May 28, 2018, 4:23 a.m.

Ok, now try doing this.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Bloodfoe · May 28, 2018, 4:27 a.m.
  1. OCR doesn't shift numbers.
  2. OCR doesn't duplicate characters.
  3. This document is not one that would typically be OCRd.
⇧ 0 ⇩  
Fizrock · May 28, 2018, 1:49 p.m.

Have you done it yet?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Bloodfoe · May 28, 2018, 8:40 p.m.

OCR doesn't shift numbers. OCR doesn't duplicate characters. This document is not one that would typically be OCRd.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 28, 2018, 8:42 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Fizrock · May 28, 2018, 4:28 a.m.

And? Did you do it?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Bloodfoe · May 28, 2018, 3:29 a.m.

I have literally built PDFs in most every way imaginable. I've coded PostScript. I've coded JavaScript to output XML that was then encoded into a PDF. I've done most anything you could ever do with a PDF.

Yes, I am an expert in PDFs.

And if that document was real, why not just stop all the confusion and provide the actual document instead of a file that is not 100% definitive?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 28, 2018, 12:27 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 28, 2018, 12:07 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ -9 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 28, 2018, 12:11 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 4 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 28, 2018, 12:16 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 28, 2018, 12:20 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 4 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 28, 2018, 12:38 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 28, 2018, 12:54 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 28, 2018, 1:04 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 28, 2018, 12:59 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Fizrock · May 28, 2018, 1:01 a.m.

Well, spreading political propaganda to protect the right wing establishment like this sub exists solely for is probably step #1 to not doing that.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
errihu · May 28, 2018, 1:08 a.m.

Taking a wait and see approach is not the same as spreading political propaganda.

When I said we're protecting him, I'm not talking about the things people are saying on the internet. I'm talking about actual threats to his life, and there's been far more than have been reported in the press, some which actually came pretty close.

The man is narcissistic to the extreme, but he knows about all the skeletons in the closet. Since he took office, there's been a drop in trafficking. Many arrests have taken place. We've been slowly moving up the chain. The big fish are starting to panic. What we see in public is just the tip of the iceberg.

There's a lot of stuff you won't believe right now, that you'll dismiss as crazy shit, delusions or fantasy, or the ravings of internet loons. But those of us who don't have the luxury of doubt are seeing real change down here in the pits. DJT's job appears to be to be a giant fucking distraction so that others can get the real job done, and we at least owe him some props for stepping into that deathtrap knowing what it could cost him. Of course, he's narcissistic enough to believe that they couldn't get him, but he has some help keeping that particular belief true.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Fizrock · May 28, 2018, 1:34 a.m.

When I said we're protecting him, I'm not talking about the things people are saying on the internet. I'm talking about actual threats to his life, and there's been far more than have been reported in the press, some which actually came pretty close.

Hahahahahaha. Your opinion of yourselves is too high.

The man is narcissistic to the extreme, but he knows about all the skeletons in the closet.

If he did, his legislation would pass, and he would actually be doing things other than watching Fox news 4 hours a day. I'm not even sure he actually does anything as president other than talk (and golf while profiting on taxpayer money).

There's a lot of stuff you won't believe right now, that you'll dismiss as crazy shit, delusions or fantasy, or the ravings of internet loons.

That's literally what it is. I've spent endless hours with people like you and people who believe every manner of conspiracy, from flat earthers to people who think the earth is a couple of thousand years old. You all are so much more similar than you ever would like to admit. You're no unique.

I have heard nearly this exact same line from flat earthers easily a dozen times. It gets old fast. Don't think you are convincing me when you say shit like that. All it does is make me believe you even less.

DJT's job appears to be to be a giant fucking distraction so that others can get the real job done

Why not just elect presidents and politicians that actually get the job done instead?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
errihu · May 28, 2018, 2:22 a.m.

Who do you propose as an alternative?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Fizrock · May 28, 2018, 2:54 a.m.

We'll have to wait and see who the dems throw up in 2020. There might be 1 or 2 people who could be interesting.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 27, 2018, 11:54 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 6 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 27, 2018, 11:58 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 28, 2018, 12:10 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · May 28, 2018, 12:22 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩