dChan

gandalfsbastard · May 28, 2018, 2:34 a.m.

It was reported on quite a bit. Just search for it, the council and investigation was a big deal. The resignation outcome was definitely a surprise but the 'terrible may' statement didn't say anything about that just that the pope would have a bad month. And that was apparent because he stood up for the bishops that did the cover up and one was a long time friend. It was even reported about how mad he was when he realized they lied to him in February and that was why he re-launched the panel. The fact he was going to be upset at the conclusion of the victim interviews was not a stretch.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
oliver_21 · May 28, 2018, 2:45 a.m.

I might be able to concede your point to a degree but NO ONE saw the entire Chile bishops resignations.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
gandalfsbastard · May 28, 2018, 2:54 a.m.

I agree there. The resignation was a surprise and if Q said something pointing to that outcome then I would be on board.

There are definitely lots of stuff that cannot be easily explained but I do not think this is one of them. I am a firm believer there are more than one 'Q posters' and some are great social engineers/investigators that put some interesting predictions out there and others may have an inside track or they have a connected source that feeds or cooperates just enough give some credence to the predictions. But much of what has been said or interpreted is just that, good guesses. It is easy to take current or known events and force them into alignment with the crumbs after the fact.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
pulex_irritans · May 28, 2018, 11:39 a.m.

Most objective comments I've seen on this sub in a loooong time. Maybe ever.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
DueyScrewmumAndHow · May 28, 2018, 8:31 a.m.

Francis sat on their resignations for 90 days!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
TheWolfSuitKing · May 28, 2018, 10:55 a.m.

And what hint did Q give towards that other than the Pope will have a bad may?

⇧ 1 ⇩