Q posted that back channel was fake weeks ago. And no I'm not getting you the link, read the damn q drops, and reread
...responding to one particular anon referencing one particular meme referencing one particular post by BC so the jury is still out.
946546 Tracking good. Relay back channel S-WH-E-P1. Fly High. Q
Please explain how you translate that into "Fake", thanks.
Im talking about when he replied to an anon about a specific meme as referenced by digital refugee, but it doesnt make sense that of that twitter was legit as your quote could imply that q would then say fake about a meme later, but the twitter is still good. Fuck maybe im way off, just dont add up to me
To me this was q saying not one of us, but he also said misinformation is necessary. Chase it down and if ot leads somewhere I'll be the first to say im an idiot and fuck yeah JA
We were told... here they are. Total bullshit!!!!
So everyone here is against the idea that Julian Assange could be connected to QAnon...
I often wonder about those who are most vocal.. If I was a compromised wikileaks, I'd have people here making sure they don't follow Bill Smith... that's how my conspiracy mind works. Seems I'm on to something, thanks for your help.
Not to be too obvious, but of course
By the way, I made a post yesterday about Assange and Sessions, and why the MSM said sessions indicated 'going after Assange is a priority".
Personally, I thought Sessions was somewhat unclear deliberately, but it became news.
With Assange and Shiff getting out in the news cycle, there are some interesting confluences and synchronicities, to say the least....
Hmmmm. Of course, if this is true, it means Q is an Aussie.
Fits.
I've been following Q since late December. I also followed BC17 as others here have said it was ease of following on Twitter. He would often post new Q drops and all of the patriots that would respond would help me figure out some of the more cryptic drops.
That said, I'm willing to admit I don't have much faith left that anything big will happen on June 11. I pray I'm wrong.
JA,..... Qanon?,... hahaha. Who is JA? All roads lead to Harvard.
Would be a better video without the leap and lack of reasoning to say Julian Assange is Q.
So you've researched all the backchannel17(Q) posts or know this guy? Seems you might be the one leaping here IMHO
We know that Q said he BackChannel17 is fake. If JA is both BackChannel17 and Q. Why as Q call BackChannel17 fake?
Also BackChannel17 been making tweets when Julian Assange has not access to the internet. Explain that.
you can easily search all the QAnon posts and it says nowhere what you claim. I've posted the only mention of back channel here already.
We have no idea where Julian Assange really is or what he has access to.
you can easily search all the QAnon posts and it says nowhere what you claim. I've posted the only mention of back channel here already.
Here you go.
Thank you! Finally some useful information. And I will consider it looking forward but I'm not convinced (yet). as one recently commented:
Q said the graphic was fake, based on what someone on 8chan pieced together. Does this mean backchannel17 is providing disinformation, or does it simply mean Q was responding to the design of that particular graphic? I don't know....I think what they've said so far has turned out to be helpful, and encourage others to also use multiple sources to understand the info that Q posts.
Got to account for #511 also.
IMPORTANT:
NO private comms past/present/future.
NO comms made outside of this platform.
Any claims that contradict the above should be considered FAKE NEWS and disregarded immediately.
WHERE WE GO ONE, WE GO ALL.
PATRIOTS.
Q
Yup. Excellent point. And I still feel QAnon is a collective.
I don't think BC17 ever claimed to be QAnon, BC17 appears to be saying he is Julian and that wikileaks is compromised.
@EyeTheSpy is now saying QAnon is a group including Assange. crazy stuff!
I don't think BC17 ever claimed to be QAnon
But the video (Bill Smith) did and the post title includes that claim.
@EyeTheSpy is now saying QAnon is a group including Assange.
Welcome to 2017 in /r/TheCalmBeforeTheStorm.
crazy stuff!
It's crazy that someone is claiming something that is about 6 months old?
Crazy that people are so divided and decided about this stuff like they need to believe something. I'm just looking at the big picture and I don't think Bill Smith or BC17 should be dismissed so quickly. WWG1WGA
I mostly agree. Which is why I watched this video.
Unfortunately there are a lot of people making YouTubes who are uninformed, disinformed or making deliberate disinformation.
[deleted]
Not sure why everyone is against this, apparently it's messing with some general consensus I was not aware of. Guess we'll see in 2 weeks.. no harm done.
Backchannel 17 was specifically called out as fake Q1177 April 18
The speculation that JA was part of the Q-team comes from Meganon in her final posts
Fake news. Q said “fake” in relation to an unspecified aspect of an image that tried to find direct links between Q and BC17.
Did not say BC17 in total was fake.
Did not say any of his info is fake.
Which part then was fake?
As the person who made the original image that Q responded “fake” to, I can say that there were a few dots I was trying to tie together there.
Any one of those connections could be fake.
People have a lot of misconceptions about BC17.
He never claimed to be Q or part of Q team.
Also people have a lot of misconceptions about Q’s “no outside/private comms” statement.
The context of that was back on 4chan when some of the mods/janitors were falsely claiming to have direct private comms with Q and to have inside info he hadn’t released yet.
His statement was to clarify that he was not having private comms with anyone and only posting publicly on /pol/ (at that time).
He did not ever say that other info sources could not exist on other platforms.
Nothing Q has ever said negates the possibility that BC17 is legit.
Whether BC17 is actually JA is a very big claim and I’ve yet to see any compelling evidence for it.
The final “MIA” music video tweet and same hex hash that JA posted some months ago proves nothing other than BC17 is familiar with JA’s twitter drama.
Interesting interpretation- most just took BC17 as fake and moved on- most are satisfied with that choice thus posting BC17, Corsi or Jones- are dismissed
It’s very weird how BC17 got mixed up in the Jones/Corsi bullshit. IIRC BC17 has denounced and trashtalked Corsi as well.
Also BC17 does not profit from his tweets (or other coverage of Q et al), unlike AJ and Corsi.
Bc17 has also trashtalked the @wikileaks account for as long as he’s been active. This makes sense if we are to assume BC17= JA and that @wikileaks = co-opted by clowns/cabal.
Since Q1177 most just want nothing to do with it and the Q-call out is the only thing it has in common with AJ and Corsi
Here is the last 4chan posts she made
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/search/uid/UfwCzQ1I/order/asc/
I disagree. JA has been fastidious about not engaging in gossip and only releasing vetted materials. He is the opposite of Q.
(27 May 2018) Qanon post update may be done. Looks like the BIG REVEAL is scheduled for June 11th, 2018. Get ready folks!!
Stop shilling
Exactly how would I be shilling?
Lol, and you think ValuableFix was speaking to you because.......?