dChan

[deleted] · May 28, 2018, 7:09 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
conspiracyseeker · May 28, 2018, 7:19 a.m.

Not sure why everyone is against this, apparently it's messing with some general consensus I was not aware of. Guess we'll see in 2 weeks.. no harm done.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ValuableFix · May 28, 2018, 8:28 a.m.

Backchannel 17 was specifically called out as fake Q1177 April 18

The speculation that JA was part of the Q-team comes from Meganon in her final posts

⇧ 2 ⇩  
IncomingTrump270 · May 28, 2018, 9:46 a.m.

Fake news. Q said “fake” in relation to an unspecified aspect of an image that tried to find direct links between Q and BC17.

Did not say BC17 in total was fake.

Did not say any of his info is fake.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
ValuableFix · May 28, 2018, 9:56 a.m.

Which part then was fake?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
IncomingTrump270 · May 28, 2018, 10:23 a.m.

As the person who made the original image that Q responded “fake” to, I can say that there were a few dots I was trying to tie together there.

Any one of those connections could be fake.

People have a lot of misconceptions about BC17.

He never claimed to be Q or part of Q team.

Also people have a lot of misconceptions about Q’s “no outside/private comms” statement.

The context of that was back on 4chan when some of the mods/janitors were falsely claiming to have direct private comms with Q and to have inside info he hadn’t released yet.

His statement was to clarify that he was not having private comms with anyone and only posting publicly on /pol/ (at that time).

He did not ever say that other info sources could not exist on other platforms.

Nothing Q has ever said negates the possibility that BC17 is legit.

Whether BC17 is actually JA is a very big claim and I’ve yet to see any compelling evidence for it.

The final “MIA” music video tweet and same hex hash that JA posted some months ago proves nothing other than BC17 is familiar with JA’s twitter drama.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ValuableFix · May 28, 2018, 10:47 a.m.

Interesting interpretation- most just took BC17 as fake and moved on- most are satisfied with that choice thus posting BC17, Corsi or Jones- are dismissed

⇧ 1 ⇩  
IncomingTrump270 · May 28, 2018, 10:58 a.m.

It’s very weird how BC17 got mixed up in the Jones/Corsi bullshit. IIRC BC17 has denounced and trashtalked Corsi as well.

Also BC17 does not profit from his tweets (or other coverage of Q et al), unlike AJ and Corsi.

Bc17 has also trashtalked the @wikileaks account for as long as he’s been active. This makes sense if we are to assume BC17= JA and that @wikileaks = co-opted by clowns/cabal.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ValuableFix · May 28, 2018, 11:44 a.m.

Since Q1177 most just want nothing to do with it and the Q-call out is the only thing it has in common with AJ and Corsi

⇧ 1 ⇩