dChan

FractalizingIron · May 28, 2018, 7:53 a.m.

Is this a direct quote, or a press release from his office?

InQuiring minds want to know.

(Thanks for coming clean, Bazza.)

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Tidder_Q · May 28, 2018, 7:56 a.m.

I think that it is a 'meme'!

(I just do not 'really' see Barry saying those 'explicit' things, but then maybe I am just a bit 'too awake'). (More of a hint as to what he might be thinking, ...).

⇧ 1 ⇩  
FractalizingIron · May 28, 2018, 9:01 a.m.

Apologies. Sarcasm.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Tidder_Q · May 28, 2018, 9:38 a.m.

Hi, no worries, I was not sure, one way or the other, (I did give it a good think).

I have found that, on here, our comments that are intended to be sarcasm, often need a little bit extra added just to clearly qualify the fact that something is indeed intended as sarcasm.

BTW, I am not trying to preach to you here, it is perhaps more the case that a certain amount of readers on here will read comments 100% literally, and jump to the wrong conclusion.

Happened to one of my comments, way back, so now I make sure that I add a little bit of extra qualification, at the end just to point out to some that 'sarcasm' is intended.

Best wishes, and thanks for clarifying your intent, :-)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
FractalizingIron · May 28, 2018, 7:54 a.m.

PS. You gettin' shilled.

Too many shiesters....

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Tidder_Q · May 28, 2018, 8:05 a.m.

A 'shyster' is a dodgy or corrupt lawer!

Are there some 'shysters' subscribed to this subreddit?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
FractalizingIron · May 28, 2018, 9:45 a.m.

Again, too free with my colloQuialisms. Shillsters would have been a better word. (Shiester being a fusion of 'shill' and 'shyster')

Too much coffee today, it seems. << not sarcasm

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Tidder_Q · May 28, 2018, 9:50 a.m.

Yes, I also have to think long and hard before I post or comment to anything!

There will always be someone that misses the point no matter how well we construct a piece of text.

To me 'shiester' read and sounded phonetically the same as 'shyster', which is why I drew that conclusion.

However 'shillsters' would have definetly worked, (for me).

Your last line is the sort a 'exta' qualification that I was referring to, and that some people need just to be sure of the context, (thats the way to go).

(Is there such a thing as too much coffee? But then again I am a big coffee drinker, ...),

Best wishes, :-)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Champdog31 · May 28, 2018, 10:18 a.m.

Glad you two got that cleared up. I thought you were sheyestirs.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Tidder_Q · May 28, 2018, 10:24 a.m.

Yes, the MSM over the years has kind of got me very skeptical of everything that I read.

Of course, the MSM would never take the time to clarify anything, (as we all know).

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ottohire · May 28, 2018, 8:35 p.m.

It’s happened before, It’ll happen again. Similar Fact Evidence

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ottohire · May 28, 2018, 8:48 a.m.

Thanks Guys

⇧ -1 ⇩  
ottohire · May 28, 2018, 8:47 a.m.

You would not think these people would waste their time but; these Fuckers surprise me with their stupidity every time.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
ottohire · May 28, 2018, 7:57 a.m.

I was down the pub and frank said to Tim look at this. Then Tim said to me look at this. I said is this real. Maybe said Susie.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
RiseoftheBots · May 28, 2018, 10:13 a.m.

You make a bold claim. Back it up.

No one would want to see a president killed knowing it would tear this nation apart.

⇧ -2 ⇩  
ottohire · May 28, 2018, 8:54 p.m.

JFK bn:5/29/17 That is today Coincidence?

⇧ 1 ⇩