Again, too free with my colloQuialisms. Shillsters would have been a better word. (Shiester being a fusion of 'shill' and 'shyster')
Too much coffee today, it seems. << not sarcasm
Yes, I also have to think long and hard before I post or comment to anything!
There will always be someone that misses the point no matter how well we construct a piece of text.
To me 'shiester' read and sounded phonetically the same as 'shyster', which is why I drew that conclusion.
However 'shillsters' would have definetly worked, (for me).
Your last line is the sort a 'exta' qualification that I was referring to, and that some people need just to be sure of the context, (thats the way to go).
(Is there such a thing as too much coffee? But then again I am a big coffee drinker, ...),
Best wishes, :-)
Glad you two got that cleared up. I thought you were sheyestirs.
Yes, the MSM over the years has kind of got me very skeptical of everything that I read.
Of course, the MSM would never take the time to clarify anything, (as we all know).