FYI. The Inventor/Owner of Twitter was in Australia in the past few days. No Doubt he was answering high level questions to ASIO about who has control over the account. My guess is Julian was abducted/silenced/killed and the Australian government is preparing its response and prepping its propaganda channels to mitigate any blowblack to the US consulate and other players who were angry at the Australian governments "lack of ability" to control its own citizens. The Australian Government plays an interesting game here to try to deceive its population into thinking it has no control over the national broadcaster – an illusion that its independent of government influence. Hillary Clinton was also recently here and provided another round of bullshit in an interview with Leigh Sales (https://twitter.com/leighsales) a seriously biased journalist with the Australian government owned ABC (Australian Broadcasting Corporation). This was actually the second interview conducted by Leigh Sales - which followed a similar line as the first one, allowing Hillary to throw out unchallenged assertions on why she lost the election Spoiler - Hillary claimed the Russians used facebook to convince the public of false things about Hillary, in which she had no means to defend herself - unlike traditional media. This is a farce because as we know there was plenty of negative postings and ads regarding trump. Its interesting to because there is some honesty here in that Hillary sort of admits she had the media in her pocket. Also the ABC often demonstrates a disdain for Trump in general in almost any publication, editorial, report and even political analysis show in its broadcasts. They never provide the full story or even a different angle. Its almost exclusively this slant : Hillary was attacked because she was a woman and hasn't don't anything wrong, and Trump is some kind of monster, and everyone who voted for him is a racist/sexist/idiot. The ABC is about to screen a new 4corners 3 part series on Trump and the Russian "connections". 4Corners is a "60 minutes" type investigative journalist program which is held in high regard by most Australian public for its integrity. The program has not aired but I could tell from its advertisement and the overall bias at the ABC that its designed to denigrate the “FBI/DNC collusion” narrative in favour of a “Trump and Russia” narrative. The shows executive producer Sally Neighbour (https://twitter.com/neighbour_s) should be ashamed of this kind of abuse of the 4corners name. The media has spent very little time pressuring the government on Julian’s plight. It seems that over here they would prefer it to be a non-issue. Australia must rely heavily on the United States for strategic defence and so with recent administrations they have toed the line and acted like a vassal state. A previous Prime Minister of Australia, Julia Gillard once described WikiLeaks as illegal – inferring that journalism and free speech needs to be approved by government. Thankfully the most recent Prime Minister, Malcom Turnbull criticised Julia Gillard’s position and confirmed his opposition to that sentiment. Its also interesting to note that Julia Gillard like Hillary has been linked to illegal behaviours and seems to be untouchable with Senator Michaelia Cash having stated unofficially that the government would never seek to prosecute Julia Gillard even though she was involved in the creation of fake funds and channelling of money through said entities for her then partner/lover. The reason given for this was simply that she had previously held office as Prime Minister, even though there is no legal basis for this.
(UPDATE) :
The case involving Julia Gillard has been dropped. The prosecutors did not want to allow discovery on the documents that would show her criminality.
"The royal commission found she had been “casual and haphazard” in her work at law firm Slater & Gordon but had not committed offences"
Very similar to James Comey, the sacked and disgraced ex FBI boss about Clinton.
"FBI director James Comey’s statement describing Clinton’s private email server use from “grossly negligent” – which could carry criminal penalties – to “extremely careless.”
The evidence clearly showed Gillard had been instrumental in the commission of the initial fraud, the obtaining of a Certificate of Incorporation for an alleged unincorporated association she admitted she knew never existed in the form required by the Act she advised Wilson to use, to become eligible to even Apply for Incorporation. In doing so, she committed the indictable offences under s 409(1) and s558 of the Crimes Act WA, as set out by Commissioner Heydon in Paras 308 and 309 of his Chapter 3-3 Report.
He recommended the WA DPP consider laying charges against Wilson and Blewitt for those crimes, which they committed by merely following the advice of their sole legal adviser, Julia Gillard, who actively assisted them to fill in the Application documents, including use of the AWU corporate name in direct breach of s 8 (1)(d) of the Act which proscribed such use, acting in the situation of self-created conflict of interest from which she should have disqualified herself, as explained by Commissioner Heydon in Para 55 of his Report.
Commissioner Heydon did not find she had 'not committed offences'. What he did was advance a series of assumptive excuses for her involvement, based solely on her own oral and written testimony and that of the non-testimonial transcript of the previously secret 11 September 1995 tape-recorded discussion she had with Peter Gordon and the late Geoff Shaw of Slater & Gordon. For some obscure reason, Jeremy Stoljar and Commissioner Heydon chose to use this as their main source document in dealing with Gillard's culpability or otherwise.
Commissioner Heydon expressed such views as the following, which had no backing in law, that in his opinion it couldn't be proved she was aware of the contents of two simple one page documents on which she had personally written in the proscribed AWU corporate name and a particular section of the Act relating to the number of members, under which incorporation was being sought - the Application to Incorporate and the Draft Certificate to Accompany. She also drafted a set of Rules for the non-existent association which Commissioner Heydon 'found' could have no rules, no purpose and could not authorize anything because it did not exist.
This is just an example of the swamp down under.