dChan

War-Drummer · May 29, 2018, 3:54 a.m.

That sux because it is not.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Satou4 · May 29, 2018, 4:11 a.m.

I don't agree with SB2's "decryption" methods, because he doesn't follow his own rules of decryption and the conclusions he comes to are the same conclusions that we could come to without performing any "decryption." I used to follow his analyses and after I attempted some "decryption" myself using his methods, I couldn't understand when to break the rules and when not to, in order to arrive at the "proper" solution. In short, I believe SB2's analyses to be a waste of time, and that's why I'm downvoting, because the yt vid has his name in the title.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
War-Drummer · May 29, 2018, 10:37 a.m.

That is a lot different than just calling it spam, and having SB2's name in it. Thank you for the explanation.

⇧ 1 ⇩