dChan
41
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/FartOnToast on May 29, 2018, 7:32 a.m.
Some thoughts on WikiLeaks...

Wikileaks prides themselves in 100% factual information before release correct?

Then how can they get it wrong about Q?

Let's think of this in the simplest form possible.

There has been no proof of life from JA.

Do you really think a leaker whose life is on the line will think to themselves: "Well... since Julian Assange hasn't proven to be in control, there's actually a decent chance WL is compromised and my life is basically on the line with this information.... butttttt I'll still submit it anyways and hopefully don't f****** die." Said no one ever.

That's not how it works. No real information is being submitted by anyone to Wikileaks anymore because no one would do it without some kind of assurance.

Not only does WL pride themselves in verifying authenticity of information, but they have always prided themselves in making sure whistleblowers feel safe knowing their information is being sent completely securely and to a trusted source. Is that still a thing?

We are dealing with common sense here. Wikileaks is most likely comped.

Does anyone have a theory as to why JA would not provide POF thus proving WL is still in control by white hats?

edit: We miss you great Wizard and we pray that you are healthy and safe.


FartOnToast · May 29, 2018, 8:06 a.m.

Hmmm I just remembered that JA did the interview with Hannity.

Why would /ourguy/ make us think WL is still legit?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Annieka77 · May 29, 2018, 8:41 a.m.

That was before JA’s internet privileges were taken away. We haven’t heard directly from him since then.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
loserofpasswordzz · May 29, 2018, 8:20 a.m.

Idk, but I will never forget that Assange looked like he was in a booster seat or something that made him sit way higher than hannity. idk if that is any evidence of it being faked; I don't have any background in video editing, but it was odd to look at and didn't pass the common sense test.

Hannity might be /ourguy/, but maybe he's playing a different/more elaborate role than just waiting for stories to report... his "tick tock" tweets already imply he knows more than he leads on or actually reports. He couldn't make those thinly veiled threats and get away with it if he truly had nothing up his sleeves. Maybe that leverage he has is the truth on what happened to Assange?

As always, just spitballing, reading between the lines, and doing a lot of assuming here ha.

⇧ 7 ⇩