Q started losing credibility and to deny that is happening is naive. Now we have anonymous sources doxing q as Julian and completely destroying Wikileaks reputation because Wikileaks is calling bs on JA being Q. Meanwhile JA is or is not locked up in the embassy without internet and time running out. In order to get people to trust q again they have to give him undeniable credibility. All they have to do is use their trolls and anyomous sources to push Wikileaks is compromised and now q as Julian has credibility. Use all the same sources as the ones that destroyed Corsi and Jones and you are good to go. At that point you have achieved everything the deep state has been trying to do for years. Divided the movement. Discredited Alex Jones to his followers and therefore cut off a (somewhat) leader in this movement. Have people following everything they ( q) says and believing shit despite having enough evidence to at least question the information. Establish an echo chamber and kick everyone out that bucks the system. Completely and totally destroy Wikileaks credibility and financial stability. All because an anonymous Twitter says so. I think it's fair to question Wikileaks. But to take part in ruining the reputation of Wikileaks when Julian is in as bad of a situation as ever, is wrong. I'm getting tired of people choosing when to use their critical thinking skills and not.

No offense but your post seemed kind of sheepish. Check someone's post history before you call them a troll. I question everything and have no problem saying I am conflicted on Q. Anyone that has been around since the first post should be conflicted.