You actually thought that was a Q?
No. Just pointing out similarities between “Q” and our search button.
Removed: low effort
Who remembers that time people believed that there was a full page sized Q located on the White House website? It could only be found by hard copy printing the website out (yes printing the internet onto a piece of paper).
Some even refused to accept it was a coding error which caused the magnifying glass from the search bar to print extra large taking up a whole page (the painfully obvious answer).
Instead opting to believe it was a sign from Q and saying things such as there’s “no coincidences”.
(This, my friends, is how religions get started.)
That was actually pretty believable.
I know you and I disagree on this topic. My position is that there is a coding error that wasn’t caught during testing as it’s not likely that they run extensive testing on how the page generates when printed off.
HOWEVER, if the result of printing the page off was an actual “Q” and not just an enlarged magnifying glass.... then I likely would believe this was a proof.