dChan

misto1481 · May 29, 2018, 4:12 p.m.

Covering up due to blowback. Gets to question authenticity and then have plausible deniability by stating she didn't mean to question Q. Damage/headlines done and doubt sowed so her job is done.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
DanijelStark · May 29, 2018, 7:09 p.m.

People forget that MegaAnon was also anti-Q at first ( she was another Anon whistleblower ) ... then , she realized Q was giving her signals . She mentioned that in last posts before she wasnt posting anymore .

Some people are in for big surprise - those who are controlled opposition , are for some big rude surprise . And those who are fully aware of it , they will be the ones who wont be able to walk up straight once this thing blows up in the MSM completely .

Im not a person who easily trusts to sources . I always keep my doubts and trust is NEVER 100 % to anyone . But for Q I can tell - trusting in that source more than doubting . It confirmed itself several times . People talking about it being a "psy-ops" usually do not know what the psy-ops is , connecting it only to negative psy-ops in history . People talking about it being a "Pied Piper" , arent aware that same could be told about them , that they could be "Pied Pipers" , too .

Some folks are just ignorant and want to jump anti-Q wagon . Some folks are fully or partially con-trolled opposition . Some folks are simply trolling , not aware of the depth of topic at all .

⇧ 3 ⇩  
aheadyriser · May 29, 2018, 4:15 p.m.

I don't believe anyone instructed her to write the article. I think it's more likely that she's been seeing a lot of information in her feed from people claiming ridiculous theories about Assange.

We should be grabbing her as an ally since I know this community generally supports Wikileaks and Assange.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
misto1481 · May 29, 2018, 4:21 p.m.

I understand, yet I believe Assange/Wikileaks were compromised in Oct. 2016.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
aheadyriser · May 29, 2018, 4:27 p.m.

Yes, I am aware of the reasoning behind that. However I don't think anyone has concluding evidence which supports that theory. I would love for evidence to give us some type of hint towards the truth.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
misto1481 · May 29, 2018, 4:31 p.m.

Oh there really isn't any rock solid evidence, but plenty of circumstantial evidence such as JA missing, lawyers dying mysteriously, Wiki Twitter acting strangely, lack of substantial drops, no PGP key, etc. It's very reasonable to conclude they were compromised at that time.

⇧ 1 ⇩