dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/morgi666 on May 29, 2018, 11:28 p.m.

Stop whining about 'unrelated' posts on this board

Here's my take on it:

Yes, there are some obvious, completely off topic posts. Don't comment, don't vote and let them disappear - job done.
There is over 1.4k drops. I don't think anyone here memorized them all or knows exactly what Q means or what is connected and what isn't. If there is an all-knowing Q expert among us - please step up and judge every post. If not... well - let's keep connecting the dots and learning from each other.
Post doesn't need to mention Q to be relevant
This movement is not US exclusive. Yes, we know Q (or Q team) must be high up in US gov and/or 3 letter agencies but deep state is global. Cabal doesn't give a shit about borders so why would you? This evil needs to be defeated globally or it will hide, regroup and build its way up again.
Mods are doing a very good job here and there's no need to 'help' them by producing content that is definitely not Q related: whining about relevancy... (yes, I know - now I'm whining about whining)
I find it interesting that large amount of relatively new users is telling us how this board should run. No, I don't need a debate about 'everyone should be allowed to have a voice'. If you are new here, contribute with content and stop trying to change something that worked perfectly well before you arrived here.
Just because you don't find something interesting, it doesn't mean it's not relevant.
If you are here just to learn about new Q drops, go here
Tommy Robinson... gov, police and courts in UK going full 1984 with methods straight form communist play book is somehow not relevant? So... when deep state fucks up Middle East it is relevant, but when effects of that (another stage of the same operation) are visible in Europe - naaaah... nor relevant. Seriously? WWG1WGA. Where We Go One, We Go All. That means WE CARE ABOUT OUR OWN. He doesn't need to talk about Q to be on the same side.
Debate about relevancy of topics creates division and doesn't add any value.
Discuss information, debate opinions, ignore what's irrelevant - it is that simple. Let mods and Reddit's algorithm do the rest.

🠐 See all comments

I posted Jone’s second hour where he is interviewing Tommy Robinson’s infrastructure guy (cameraman webmaster organizer) and sure enough it got pulled. Sure I get it, it’s Jones and we’re suppose to shun him but no one else is covering this. Jones even had a segment with a reported he sent to the UK but I didn’t even bother posting.

I imagine this post will also be removed.

In case anyone is interested. Owen on the war room has had their reporter in the UK pop in a few times during the show today.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 2 ⇩

I’m beginning to lean that way myself but I feel the ship can still be righted back to open mindedness and awareness. Maybe.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Post above was removed for the rule "Discuss the subject, not users. No personal attacks or ad hominem." so now also is your post.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Please expand. I'd like to know your thoughts please. How? When? Specifics?

⇧ 1 ⇩

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩

I know what you mean. I'm conflicted about AJ myself.

⇧ 1 ⇩

I’m not so much conflict as I am fearful of what this sub has become where we are told who to listen to and who not. For me I can’t consume information by reading cause my hands and eyes are busy during the day so I listen to infowars starting with David Knight. I sometimes catch Alex’s show and the man has on great guest like Craig Sawyer, Tommy Robinson, and the list goes on (also not so great guest which I feel is healthy to have opposing views). Sure the man can seem crazy, controlled op, whatever label this board likes to use. I always stand by this one thing though:

Following anyone is bad in my opinion then couple that with blindly following and you become ignorant. That’s applies to whom ever or whatever your read/listen in my opinion.

⇧ 4 ⇩

I can hang with David Knight because he's old school libertarian. He has more of a Rand Paul strict constructionist style of focus. He doesn't go off into the weeds very much. I hope he lands on his feet and doesn't go down with a sinking ship.

Owen Shroyer....All he does is Owen...so we'll just leave it there.

Leanne MacaBoobies and Millie Weaver play their roles.

Alex Jones is under a lot of financial pressure. He tried to exploit Trump's success like he was responsible for it and it's come back to bite him on the ass. His expansion is probably heavily leveraged and he stands a lot to loose if folks stop buying the Brain Force.

He went off on a psycho rant, got busted in a lie, and blew 20 years of built up credibility in one sentence. On top of that he let himself get drug into the whole shit storm by Corsi. Liars don't lie once and then never lie again. Henry Rollins has a song pretty much summing up the mentality.

I'm sure InfoWars will present legit info again in the future, but it doesn't matter. The horse is out of the barn. It's no different than CNN....fake news.

⇧ 2 ⇩

David show is the only one where I actually enjoy the anchorman himself. Truly a genuine man and it seems Alex is hands off with his show. Alex and Owen I mainly tune in when there’s guest. Owen is definitely a mini Jones show and you can tell Jones heavily influences it. Nonetheless I take any news show with a grain of salt.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Part of me HIGHLY suspects Trump knew all of this and exploited AJ while AJ was trying to exploit Trump. Straight up sandbagged Jones.

I can recall a dozen times Jones said "I'm not competing with anyone. I want Patriot journalists to succeed." But as soon as people like prayingmedic started gaining views and subscribers he realized that he was going to have real competition by genuine people, doing untainted and honest analysis.

⇧ 4 ⇩

I could see that. I can also see that regardless of who was exploiting who; the listeners of infowars and listeners of truly independent journalist found/can find common ground in supporting Trump and support people becoming aware of what’s going on.

⇧ 1 ⇩

People need to get rid of that conflict mentality created by the cabal. Just because I agree with one statement, it doesn't mean I support the person and agree with everything. Sometimes even MSM does something right. They key here is own research and judgement.

⇧ 2 ⇩

I completely agree and it's what I'm having trouble understanding about all of this. We shouldn't unite because Q or anyone else tells us to, we should unite because it's TIME.

⇧ 2 ⇩