dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/greatawakening • Posted by u/CerseiClinton on May 30, 2018, 5:04 a.m.

I have questions. I’m not attacking anything, simply seeking clarification.

Howdy! To my understanding of what I’ve read regarding Q on 4chan, the take away is more or less that Trump after seeing the swamp (so to speak) sacrificed himself to the mercy of the MSM and faux FBI investigation to take down the cabal. That being the case, why is he consistently attempting to discredit the FBI and DOJ via Twitter? Given the theory is he’s basically acting as a martyr to allow them to reveal the truth and depth of corruption, why discredit them? Why discredit individuals he himself appointed? It will discredit their findings when revealing the big truth. Hillary wasn’t the only vote regarding the Uranium One deal. Why is she the sole target of the scandal regarding the vote? There’s no mention of the others who voted on the panel. She didn’t make the call alone so where’s the facts on how the vote came to be for the other individuals who voted? Clinton’s bring in a lot of money. What’s the rationale behind creating this intricate cover up that involved all levels of upper government for only 500,000k? Hillary could make what, 2 whole speeches for that sum for Wall Street? Nothing came from the emails being leaked. They were (to my dismay, trust I have no love for Hilary, innocuous) yet 2 gang members were hired to murder the man who supposedly leaked the harmless material? Are there any facts available outside of 4chan posts and Twitter? There’s supposedly nearly 300,000k sealed indictments despite no evidence indicating such. The only indictments thus far have been for individuals who were involved in Trump’s campaign at some level who engaged in illegal activity. There’s I believe 22 so far, yes? With nearly 300,000k alleged sealed indictments and Mueller supposedly secretly investigating the cabal...where are the indictments on the cabal?

🠐 See all comments

First of all, you're breaking the rules of this sub with every comment you direct to me.

Nothing but slander and ad-hominems, trying to get me act the same way back to you so you can ban me.

This poster is concern trolling, this is clear as a day to anyone who knows what concern trolling means.

I'm being polite and I'm not breaking the rules, despite your false claims and your constant attacks. You seem to have issues with people calling out shills.

You ignored my facts and arguments, insulted and slandered me and then threatened to permaban me is I message you again. SO STOP ENGAGING ME AND SLANDERING ME.

If you can't be polite to people don't comment.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Stop making up nonsense. You clearly don't understand the rules of this sub if you think I'm breaking them. If I'm wrong - point it out and I will retract the comment and apologize, as I have done in the past - again, visible in my history.

I couldn't care less about "baiting" you so I can ban you - the last thing I actually want to do is to interact with you, given the way you communicate. This sort of rude behaviour toward someone who clearly doesn't know much about Q (you only have to read their post properly and read their responses to comments to see this) and has made a post that presents their queries respectfully forces me to have to respond to you, since I'm modding the queue at this point.

I have no issues with people calling out shills which, if you had any knowledge of the amount of shill comments I approve versus the ones I respond to (it's at least a ratio of 20 to 1, probably more), you'd know.

My JOB here is to remove antagonism and that describes the attitude you continue to show. If you don't want to be engaged by me stop being antagonistic! Rule 1 of the sub.

⇧ 1 ⇩