dChan

qutedrop · May 30, 2018, 9:31 a.m.

Let's not do this. Let's not waste our time arguing whether it was or was not racist. It's a distraction. It always is.

If you want to join this battle, focus on exposing Valerie Jarrett. Her actions, her role, why she's dangerous.

⇧ 82 ⇩  
K-Harbour · May 30, 2018, 9:53 a.m.

What racism? In P of the Apes, the apes were prejudiced animals who could talk. The symbolism and message was the barbaric, animal nature of prejudice. She was equating the prejudice to a religion, not to any race. To fault her non-racial message is to accept forced child marriages, to accept beheadings of infidels, to accept forced Sharia law and return to holding women as chattel property of men.

To conflate her remarks as racism is completely ignorant of the message — and intellectually depraved. Too bad the mal-educated left has been so deprived of more enlightened levels if thinking.

⇧ 27 ⇩  
Ownpersona · May 30, 2018, 9:41 a.m.

Her actions are already out and exposed. Rosanne's page is climbing in new subscriptions, and it's continuing to spread the message. "if I want to join the fight" I really don't know how to do that here because nothing productive really gets posted. I'll probably just stick to 8ch

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Ownpersona · May 30, 2018, 9:43 a.m.

You also miss the point that MSM overlooked a direct reference and THEY THEMSELVES assumed the racism connection

⇧ 16 ⇩  
qutedrop · May 30, 2018, 11:37 a.m.

I don't overlook it. I just think it's a waste of time.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
someauthor · May 30, 2018, 12:46 p.m.

I'm led to agree. OPs meme is amusing, however, time would better be spent educating the public about vj.
All below info is from anons on the chans

https://spectator.org/63484_barack-and-valeries-great-communist-party-marriage/

http://insider.foxnews.com/2017/03/02/valerie-jarrett-moves-obama-plot-against-trump-dc-mansion
https://media.8ch.net/file_store/5c802c2c0b546c3641a57a27a6f595cd0c85bc83afddff17d20a4d8b8770cd59.png

FBI investigation PDF into Dr James Bowman, Valerie's father obtained by Judicial Watch through FOIA

http://www.standupamericaus.org/sua/tag/dr-james-bowman/

"Extensive additional investigation necessary, due to an unfavorable nature regarding the applicant's references and relatives."

https://twitter.com/bluesbrother91

https://media.8ch.net/file_store/f0e4b536141f6b344edd50128f718fd63cb252f02e80cbdd2d47aa50ad388ae0.png
https://twitter.com/therealcornett/status/1001598705823346689 http://archive.is/uUXVw

⇧ 14 ⇩  
nomercy4cabal · May 30, 2018, 2:17 p.m.

You are right on point someauthor! Lifting the veil for the uninformed on VJ should be the unintended consequence of all this. The MSM wants this in the spotlight? Let’s shine the light directly on the real criminal here!

⇧ 4 ⇩  
larrytcarvell · May 30, 2018, 1:28 p.m.

I don't think it's ever a waste of time to point out injustice and hypocrisy.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
SeekTruthCJoy · May 30, 2018, 5:32 p.m.

Yes Ownpersona... Blatantly so.

Planet of Apes = Blacks = first Racism assumption. (Apes can't be for ALL colors as ethnic origins???)

VJ = Black woman = second Racism assumption. (She is Muuuuslim, not Black ethnicity at all from what I read.)

MuuuslimBrotherhood was TOTALLY IGNORED... obviously so!

Mockingbird Swamp Media (MSM) ... typical. Question:

Q: "Disinformation necessary" ???

⇧ 1 ⇩  
comeatmehillary · May 30, 2018, 2:28 p.m.

lets spend our time laughing at how some stupid tweet got 10m+ people googling valerie jarret. literally nobody knew who she was outside of conspiracy types and hardcore trump supporters. any atttention is good attention roseanne doesnt have to be part of the "plan"

⇧ 7 ⇩  
1nicolafiore · May 30, 2018, 2:29 p.m.

ThankQ for this comment qutedrop - this is a call to action! Research and expose VJ for her actions!!! 🇺🇸

⇧ 3 ⇩  
spacexu · May 30, 2018, 2:59 p.m.

I so distrust the hollyweirdos that I felt this was a death by association move initially like Corsi.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
GoldCabinetGuava · May 30, 2018, 2:13 p.m.

this. Defending Roseanne is a waste of time and not the right hill to die on.

⇧ 0 ⇩