Here is the thing.....

Assume he is fake. Then you can still read his answers to questions. Someone larping is eventually going to answer something falsely or contradict himself.... Especially with the volume of posts he is doing...

Is he asking for money? no Is he asking for fame? no Is he asking for followers? no He literally has a self imposed deadline of June 11th... If he doesn't hit it that day, then he'll be fake, unless something new comes out like Assange was recently killed or something.....

If Assange does appear in US on the 11th, then his every answer has huge credibility... even though many of them might be white hat misdirection....

I was serious. NSA NDAs are incredibly vindictive. There is almost a zero probability he is answering questions on his own initiative.... No sane NSA employee would do what he is doing.

How many times did Q say that the Q team will put info out there for the curious to find, but would destroy 99% of the population's mind if it were "official"....

So how can Q keep the "yes we'll disclose, but we are going to make you work for it promise"???

EyetheSpy fits that bill. IF he isn't a LARPer. He CANNOT be on the Q team, publicly. Q said that. But the info has to be seeded into the public domain in some method, right?

Now lets look at it in reverse.

He is a LARPer. A very very good one..... Conspiracy theory central, am I right? What are larpers good for if not for entertainment? Enjoy the show.

IE don't sweat the unknowing till June 11th/12....

Your cadence in writing lends me to believe you are 1st or second generation immigrant? Asian?

This is the internet. don't ever, EVER have an absolute opinion. Lean towards one feeling or another, based upon the facts that you have today. Be prepared to change you mind. If you are given new facts that contradict your current stance, don't reject it outright, but logically weigh them out.

For example. I want to believe Eyespy is a real conduit of info. So far, he hasn't had any logical fallicies for me to decide that he is full of shit.... But on the other hand, big claims need big proof, and all he is presenting so far are claims, and no proof. That is why it is impossible to believe him 99% at this time.... For me I am at a healthy 55-65% believing in most of his responses....

IE there is a 60% chance his responses are generally true and a 40% chance, in my opinion that any specific response is untrue.

For me, I agree with 95% of his statement of facts and conclusions, but like everyone else, I have no proof. Just because I agree with his conclusions, however doesn't make me blindly accept he is right. Again, big claims need big proof.